Zuma, Thint: 'State must purge its dirty hands'

African National Congress deputy president Jacob Zuma and the French arms company Thint on Friday opposed any attempt to obtain documents from Mauritius, media reports said. They filed their heads of arguments in the Pietermaritzburg High Court on Friday.

African National Congress deputy president Jacob Zuma and the French arms company Thint on Friday opposed any attempt to obtain documents from Mauritius, South African Broadcasting Corporation news reported.

They filed their heads of arguments in the Pietermaritzburg High Court on Friday in a case focused on documents pertaining to an alleged meeting between Zuma, former Thint chief executive Alain Thetard and businessman and fraud convict Schabir Shaik.

The public broadcaster reported that both Zuma and Thint contended that the state did not approach the court with clean hands, claiming that the state’s conduct was unconstitutional.

Zuma’s lawyers argued that the appropriate remedy would be for the court to dismiss the application, and for the state to “purge its dirty hands by returning the copies of the documents to the Mauritian authorities”.

In papers before court, both Zuma and Thint state that search-and-seizure raids carried out in Mauritius were unlawful.

It is claimed that, in 2001, a Mauritius Supreme Court order did not authorise copies of the seized documents to be given to South African authorities and that it was improper for a South African court to adjudicate on the release of these documents.

Zuma’s legal team argued that the state was seeking to gain the upper hand by attempting to rectify the supposed flaws in its initial investigation against the former deputy president and Thint.

They insisted that by wanting to obtain the originals of the documents, the state sought to maintain and expand its ill-gotten advantages in this application.

Zuma’s lawyers also want the court to dismiss the state’s application with costs.

Meanwhile, in its heads of argument filed last week, the National Prosecuting Authority remained adamant that Zuma and Thint were using every trick to stop it from obtaining evidence for a possible trial. It felt there were reasonable grounds to believe that an act of corruption had been committed.

The matter has been set for argument in the Pietermaritzburg High Court next week.—Sapa

Topics In This Section

Countries
south africa

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

Connect

  • twitter
  • facebook
  • RSS
  • alerts
  • mobile
 

Join Up

Get the M&G in your inbox

 

Sponsored Press Releases

Unshaped ADSL with static IP address
OpenWeb
Agile methodology - how to get more done, with less, for less and still keep everyone happy
DST Global Solutions
Delivering business value by evolving to straight-through processing
DST Global Solutions
MTN highest ranked on the continent in BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands
MTN
Pragma's academy offers three-year asset management advancement programme
Pragma