Zuma tries to halt state's UK probe

African National Congress deputy president Jacob Zuma does not have the right to look over the shoulders of investigators all along the way, lawyers for the state argued in the Pretoria High Court on Thursday. Zuma brought an application to stop the national director of public prosecutions from extending an investigation to the United Kingdom.

African National Congress deputy president Jacob Zuma does not have the right to look over the shoulders of investigators all along the way, lawyers for the state argued in the Pretoria High Court on Thursday.

 

Zuma brought an application to stop the national director of public prosecutions (NDPP) from extending an investigation to the United Kingdom.

 

On Thursday, however, the arguments revolved around the technical legal issue of whether he should be allowed to challenge a request for international assistance sought by the NDPP.

 

At the end of March, the NDPP brought an ex-parte application for permission to approach banks and solicitors in the United Kingdom with a view to the possible reinstating of fraud and corruption charges against Zuma.

 

Zuma only became aware of the application after Judge Ben du Plessis ratified a letter of request for international assistance from Leonard McCarthy, the NDPP.

 

On Thursday his legal council, advocate Kemp J Kemp SC, argued that he should have been notified about the application.

 

“It’s about seeking to prosecute Mr Zuma—how can a potential accused not have an interest?” Kemp asked.

 

Lawyers for the state argued that the application was only brought as part of a process of information gathering.

 

“This is a true investigation; it might lead somewhere, it might lead nowhere,” advocate Billy Downer SC said.

The state argued that should the information gathered become evidence at a later possible trial, Zuma would then be able to challenge it.

 

The NDPP wants the assistance of the manager of Barclays Bank in London, where the account of solicitors Berwin Leighton Paisner is held.

 

It also wants to approach the solicitors about details of a payment made in August 2001 from their bank account to an entity in South Africa named Cay Nominees.

 

The NDPP argues that the payment might have been paid as a bribe.

 

Judgement was reserved.—Sapa

. .

Topics In This Section

Countries
south africa
Cities
Pretoria

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

Connect

  • twitter
  • facebook
  • RSS
  • alerts
  • mobile
 

Join Up

Get the M&G in your inbox

 

Sponsored Press Releases

Unshaped ADSL with static IP address
OpenWeb
Agile methodology - how to get more done, with less, for less and still keep everyone happy
DST Global Solutions
Delivering business value by evolving to straight-through processing
DST Global Solutions
MTN highest ranked on the continent in BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands
MTN
Pragma's academy offers three-year asset management advancement programme
Pragma