THE SMART NEWS SOURCE | Feb 09 2012 21:14 | LAST UPDATED Feb 09 2012 21:14 |
|
The Man in the Mirror should really be called Man of Straw, especially given that Joost van der Westhuizenâs middle name turns out to be Heysteck. As it is, in an unhappy confluence of demented celebritydom, the book is named not after Joostâs face seen in a powdery mirror but after his reflection in the asinine lyrics of Michael Jackson. I tweeted the reviewing process of this book live on Twitter, and it was amazing the amount of interest generated. And sympathy. But reading what less kind critics such as blogger Hurricane Vanessa have termed âJoostâs self-serving press releaseâ is actually a pleasurable experience. This is especially true if youâre a rugby fan, as thereâs no substitute for the reminiscences of someone who was as fantastic a player as Joost. But if youâre a student of human nature, youâll also find much here to intrigue. Youâll learn, for example, that Joostâs pinkie looks like âa small, erect penisâ, that he keeps bottle tops in his pocket so he can tell how many beers heâs drunk, and that âthe failure of Joostâs first marriage can probably be explained by saying âdonât get married to your sisterâ. We also learn that Joel Stransky is âevery South Africanâs favourite Jewâ, which will come as a surprise to Jesus. Yep, all fascinating stuff, but spoilt by a treatment that is at best conversational and at worst superficial. What are we to make, for example, of the writerâs claim that âperhaps people want to know all the dirt on the stars because it makes their own shabby little lives seem more bearableâ, except to sigh? And then there are the platitudes common to goldfish-like sport commentators for whom every new match is âhistoryâ. So Rugby World Cup 1995 brought âa spontaneous outbreak of unity, the likes of which the planet will probably never see againâ (yeah, loved the ironic old South African flags in the crowd), and the 30 minutes of extra time were âthe most important in the history of South Africaâ. Actually, that last assertion is made with a leavening of humour, and itâs those moments that make the book enjoyable. The description of Amor, suddenly affected by a bad oyster, squatting next to her BMW on her first date with Joost, with her panties pulled down as âthe universe dropped out of [her] bottomâ, is as funny as Joostâs response is endearing -- though it does add a new perspective to Amorâs outrage at the Sondag newspaperâs allegations of her nervous flatulence (as they oh-so-elegantly put it, âSy Poep soos ân Perdâ). And thereâs a funny anecdote about Joost being flippant with what he thought was a prank caller, who turned out to be Nelson Mandela. But when we read Joostâs assertion that âthe darkest day in South African rugby history was when Mark Keohane was appointed media liaison for the Springboksâ, as opposed to, say, Danie Craven allegedly saying that there would be a black Springbok over his dead body, or Johan le Roux biting Sean Fitzpatrickâs ear, or the Geo CronjĂ© racism incident, you remember the need to question Joost and the bookâs perspective. To author David Gemmellâs credit, he does this when detailing Joostâs reaction to Bok coach AndrĂ© Markgraaf referring to black rugby administrators as âkaffirsâ, which he describes as âglossing over the fact that Markgraaf had displayed a nasty, patronising racism ...â But the author appears to have missed the apparently inadvertent irony of a long disquisition on the evils of Keohaneâs âturning the rumours mill and manipulation of mediaâ, and how that was âa cynical attempt to arrive at a not-entirely-factual or honest outcomeâ. Itâs a bit rich in a book that actively and, it must be said, honestly, sets out to offer Joost âan easier way outâ. And although Iâm not one to give away the ending of a book, this one probably has a sillier denouement than a Dan Brown novel. The building up of suspense -- is that Joost in the video and, more importantly, will he admit it? -- is entirely spurious given the insatiable coverage the media has given the story. Itâs also a little odd that this book was written in English. The author betrays a distressing predilection for stereotyping Afrikaners. Apparently, theyâre âused to hardship and deprivationâ and would ârather do something than philosophise about it ... It was the nature of the beast.â This is apropos of Joostâs defence of the humiliating debacle that was Kamp Staaldraad, and possibly means that CornĂ© Krige is now an honorary effete Engelsman. Thereâs also an odd description of Joostâs sense of humour becoming more understated, perhaps âmore English than Afrikaans?â. The book tries to interrogate the uneasy dynamic between celebrity coverage and the right to privacy, but is rather more successful at acting it out. So, in a diatribe about the evil of Heat magazine editor Melinda Shaw and her ruining âthe lovely family lifeâ of Joostâs kids, the author bitchily describes her thus: âMelinda Shaw doesnât have kids. In fact, she doesnât have a husband.â The book leaves much unanswered, not least of which is why the author constantly refers to his desire for Joost, whom he girlishly refers to as his âNBFâ (New Best Friend), to âblow his socks offâ. Can we expect another video? But although such cheap gibes are easy to make, and letâs face it, irresistible, this is a book that deserves a little more credit. Like Steve Hofmeyrâs excellent, and far superior, Mense van My Asem, it provides a fascinating insight into the world of the South Africa celebrity. The difference, of course, is that Steveâs book portrays him as rather less ingratiating and desperate for forgiveness. TOPICS IN THIS ARTICLE
comment guidelines
|
Client Media Releases
IN THIS WEEK'S PAPER
SUBSCRIBE: - Paper edition - iPad edition (NEW!) - Kindle edition - Digital edition Read stories online ![]() @mailandguardian - Top stories & newsflashes @NicDawes - M&G editor Nic Dawes @ChrisRoperZA - Editor, M&G Online @amabhungane - M&G Centre for Investigative Journ @mgfeed - Our whole news feed Advertisements |








