/ 10 May 2012

Obama supports gay marriage

A same-sex couple poses during a mass wedding at a night club in Taipei. US President Barack Obama's declaration of support has been described as a message of hope.
A same-sex couple poses during a mass wedding at a night club in Taipei. US President Barack Obama's declaration of support has been described as a message of hope.

Barack Obama has declared his unequivocal support for same-sex marriage, taking a bold political gamble on an issue that divides American voters just months before a presidential election.

Obama’s announcement, in a hastily arranged ABC interview this week, came after years of dodging the issue. He was forced to go public partly because Vice-President Joe Biden ignited the debate with a remark in support of gay marriage at the weekend.
In the interview, Obama said he had long supported civil unions but his position on same-sex marriages had been evolving because of the powerful traditions and religious beliefs attached to the word marriage.

Obama said he had been swayed in particular by considering the service of gays and lesbians in the United States military. “At a certain point I just concluded, for me personally, it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same-sex couples should be able to get married,” Obama said.

At this stage, Obama’s commitment is purely symbolic. He made it clear it represented his personal view and that he would respect the decisions of individual states — 30 have enacted constitutional bans on same-sex marriages.

Obama’s remarks nevertheless send a powerful signal, making him the first sitting US president to come out in support of same-sex marriage.

Long-desired announcement
In the interview, Obama said he had always been adamant that gay and lesbian people should be treated fairly and equally. But he added: “I had hesitated on gay marriage, in part because I thought civil unions would be sufficient … something that would give people hospital visitation rights and other elements we take for granted. And I was sensitive to the fact that for a lot of people the word marriage was something that evokes powerful traditions, religious beliefs and so forth.”

He changed his view after speaking to family and friends, including his own daughters. “I have to tell you that over the course of several years, as I talked to friends and family and neighbours, when I think about members of my own staff who are incredibly committed, monogamous relations, same-sex relations who are raising kids together, when I think of the soldiers, airmen, marines and sailors who are out there fighting on my behalf and yet feel constrained even now, though ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ has gone, because they are not able to commit themselves in a marriage.”

Representatives of gay organisations celebrated the long-desired announcement. Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign, said: “His presidency has shown that our nation can move beyond its shameful history of discrimination and injustice. In him, millions of young Americans have seen that their futures will not be limited by what makes them different.

“In supporting marriage equality, President Obama extends that message of hope to a generation of young lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans, helping them understand that they, too, can be who they are and flourish as part of the American community.”

But there was caution and disappointment about Obama’s recent failure to pledge to issue an executive order on gay workplace rights.

The role of religion
“To be honest, it’s a little frustrating,” said Tiffani Bishop, a same-sex rights campaigner based in Austin, Texas, who has taken part in the Campaign for Southern Equality’s bid to improve gay rights. “Don’t get me wrong, it’s a great thing that he’s come out in support finally. I’m very happy he’s done that, but there are still some other things that he needs to really push hard on — one of them being the executive order.”

Although same-sex marriages are recognised in some states, there remains widespread opposition, highlighted by an overwhelming vote in North Carolina on Tuesday night to reinforce a ban on gay and lesbian marriages.

Campaigners there welcomed Obama’s stance, but said they believed that even if his comments had come a day earlier, they would not have influenced the result of the statewide ballot. Jeremy Kennedy of the Coalition to Protect North Carolina Families said: “We had a lot of endorsements on this including Bill Clinton. This really went beyond partisan politics. We had Republican supporters, Democrat supporters, Democrats that weren’t. Religion had a big part to play in the vote.”

Jasmine Beach-Ferarra of the Campaign for Southern Equality said she was “heartened” to hear the president’s support for gay marriage on a personal level.

Second-class citizens
“We understand his statement also says he believes the way to justice is on a state by state level. Our position as lesbian, gay, bisexual and trangender people in the south is that the path to equality is on a federal level, because we live as second-class citizens in the southern states and people face daily discrimination.”

Obama acknowledged in the interview that he had been partly forced into making the decision early by the controversy over Biden’s remark in a television interview on Sunday that he was comfortable with same-sex marriages.

Although polls show a consistent shift in public support in favour of gay rights, hostility remains strong among large portions of the electorate, including America’s religious right. Some Democratic strategists, including Obama advisers, proposed he leave the issue alone until after the White House election in November rather than risk alienating potential voters, especially in swing states such as North Carolina. Others argued that Obama, by sticking to his compromise position, looked weak and it was doing more damage than support of same-sex marriage. — © Guardian News & Media Limited 2012