THE SMART NEWS SOURCE | Feb 04 2012 03:59 | LAST UPDATED Feb 04 2012 03:59
News | National | Courts

New witness would prejudice Judge Motata

 JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA - Nov 06 2008 11:41


Calling a new witness to testify in Pretoria High Court Judge Nkola Motata's drunken-driving trial would prejudice Motata and infringe his rights to a fair trial, a Johannesburg magistrate said on Thursday.

"An accused person has a right to a fair trial, not trial by ambush. Is it fair for an accused person who has the right to know what case he has to meet and how to vigorously challenge it, to be confronted by this witness 14 months after the commencement of the trial? This will prejudice the accused," Magistrate Desmond Nair said.

He said calling the new witness, who only made a statement about three weeks ago, would further delay the trial as the defence would then seek a postponement for preparation purposes.

"One of the fundamental rights of the accused, relate to a speedy trial. The delay that may be necessitated will prejudice the accused," he said.

Nair said that only disclosing a witness after the trial had commenced and the accused had pleaded, was unacceptable.

"The state said it had difficulties in getting a statement from this witness. However, I am mindful of the fact that the state has expertise and machinery to collect evidence. Witnesses to crimes who refuse to testify can be dealt with through the law ... if you fail, you have to make a judgement call," Nair said.

The unknown witness, referred to as Mrs X, was brought to the attention of the court on October 13 after making a statement regarding the events on the night Motata crashed his Jaguar into a wall of a Hurlingham property.

She is reported to have witnessed the judge, allegedly in a drunken stupor, fail to cooperate with metro police officers at the scene on January 6 2007.

In her statement, the witness gave an account of the position of the vehicle which crashed into Richard Baird's wall, Motata's presence in the car, his arrest and statements he allegedly made to the effect that the metro police officers would regret their actions.

CONTINUES BELOW


When presenting this information to the court, prosecutor Zaais van Zyl said the witness had declined to give statements following the accident, despite four attempts to get statements from her.

Following van Zyl's indication that he would introduce a new witness, defence advocate Danie Dorfling said calling such a witness would prejudice Motata as she had been privy to media reports on the case.

Nair postponed the trial to November 10. - Sapa
TOPICS IN THIS ARTICLE

Related Articles

Tags

Places

People

comment guidelines
  1. Please review our comment guidelines
  2. Post your comment in the block below and press "Post as ..."
  3. Please allow between 15 minutes and 48 hours for your comment to go live
  4. Racist, sexist or stupid comments will be terminated with extreme prejudice
blog comments powered by Disqus



LATEST ARTICLES IN THIS SECTION



Client Media Releases

@mailandguardian - Top stories & newsflashes
@NicDawes - M&G editor Nic Dawes
@ChrisRoperZA - Editor, M&G Online
@amabhungane - M&G Centre for Investigative Journ
@mgfeed - Our whole news feed


Advertisements