2020 'too late for change'
Governments meeting in Durban this week are focusing on a new treaty that, if it can be achieved, will not come into force until 2020.
Carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels have increased by half in the past 20 years, giving the world far less chance of avoiding dangerous climate change, according to new data.
The research was published as lead negotiators were arriving at the United Nations climate talks in Durban, where prospects of a new global treaty on climate change appeared to have stalled—with deep divisions between developed and developing countries.
Last year emissions from burning fossil fuels rose by 5.9%, bringing the total rise since 1990, the baseline year for calculating emissions under the Kyoto Protocol, to 49%, an average rate of increase of about 3.1% a year.
Professor Corinne Le Quéré, director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research at the University of East Anglia in the United Kingdom and an author of the research paper, said the data indicated that little had been achieved in the past two decades in reducing the risks from climate change.
“There have been efforts to use more renewable energy and improve energy efficiency, but what this shows is that, so far, the effects have been marginal,” she said. “We need to do something about the 80% of energy that still comes from burning fossil fuels.”
She said the problem was urgent because the chances of holding global temperature rises to less than 2°C above pre-industrial levels, which scientists regard as the limit of safety beyond which climate change becomes catastrophic and irreversible, were dependent on emissions peaking by 2020 at the latest.
Governments meeting in Durban this week are focusing on a new treaty that, if it can be achieved, will not come into force until 2020. “That would be too late, unless strong actions are taken in the meantime,” said Le Quéré.
Some governments and policy advisers have been advocating a different approach to the climate negotiations, suggesting that a system of voluntary reductions in emissions undertaken by national governments and industries could be more effective than a “top-down” global treaty.
But this so-called “bottom-up” approach did not appear to be working, Le Quéré said, because efforts to cut emissions so far had made little impact outside Europe, where emissions had been successfully reduced.
The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Climate Change, found that global carbon emissions were likely to carry on increasing at a rate of about 3% a year. It was accompanied by another study offering new proof that climate change is linked to human activities, because of burning fossil fuel.
Professor Chris Rapley, professor of climate science at University College London, said: “These two new results offer a stark message. Human carbon emissions are certainly disturbing the climate system upon which we depend, and in spite of the economic slowdown and despite all the efforts by governments, businesses and people to reduce them, our emissions are reaching new highs. The climatic consequences, already emerging, will grow over time and are irreversible.
“A new level of decisive action is required now to achieve real emissions reductions. World leaders at the climate negotiations in Durban know the score—the opportunity to act consistent with their responsibilities and rank lies before them. We can only hope that they rise to the challenge.”
Julia Steinberger, lecturer in ecological economics at the Sustainability Research Institute, University of Leeds, said the research indicated that even the recession had barely made a dent in the rise in greenhouse-gas emissions. “The worst economic crisis in decades was apparently a mere hiccup in terms of carbon emissions—a temporary drop for the richest countries in 2009 and hardly perceived by emerging economies. These findings are truly shocking and constitute a global wake-up call,” she said.
“The economic crisis should have been an opportunity to invest in low-carbon infrastructure for the 21st century. Instead we fostered a lose-lose situation: carbon emissions rocketing to unprecedented levels, alongside increases in joblessness, energy costs and income disparities.
The transition to a green economy has never seemed more appealing.”
For the latest COP17 news and special features view our special report.