/ 6 February 2011

WikiLeaks: Egypt’s Suleiman demonised Islamists

Egypt’s new vice-president, Omar Suleiman, has long sought to demonise the opposition Muslim Brotherhood in his contacts with skeptical US officials, leaked diplomatic cables show, raising questions whether he can act as an honest broker in the country’s political crisis.

Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak has come under extreme pressure from the Egyptian public to step down after nearly three decades in power. The situation continues to escalate with unrest spreading throughout the country.

US Embassy messages from the anti-secrecy WikiLeaks cache of 250 000 State Department documents, which Reuters independently reviewed, also report that the former intelligence chief accused the Brotherhood of spawning armed extremists and warned in 2008 that if Iran ever backed the banned Islamist group, Tehran would become “our enemy”.

The disclosure came as Suleiman met on Sunday with opposition groups, including the officially banned Brotherhood, to explore ways to end Egypt’s worst political crisis in decades.

Washington has been exploring options for speeding up President Hosni Mubarak’s resignation, including a scenario that calls for turning over power to a transition government headed by Suleiman and backed by the military.

Mubarak, who had done without a vice-president for 30 years, hurriedly appointed the 74-year-old Suleiman as his deputy on January 29 as protesters demanded the autocratic ruler’s ouster.

Suleiman privately voicing disdain for the Brotherhood will not surprise Egyptians, used to the Mubarak government’s anti-Islamist stance. The comments could stoke suspicions, though, as he seeks to draw the long-banned movement into a broad dialogue on reform in response to mass protests.

The clear implication in the cache of State Department cables was that US officials were skeptical of Suleiman’s effort to depict the Brotherhood as “the bogey man”.

Mubarak’s government had long cited the Islamist threat to justify its years of authoritarian rule. A more pressing concern for Washington and its ally Israel, however, is what happens to the 1979 peace treaty between Egypt and the Jewish state if the Brotherhood gains political clout in the post-Mubarak era.

“We decline to comment on any individual classified cable,” US State Department spokesperson PJ Crowley said when asked about the documents seen by Reuters.

Accusations of extremism
In a cable dated February 15 2006, then-ambassador Francis Ricciardone reported that Suleiman had “asserted that the MB [Muslim Brotherhood] had spawned ’11 different Islamist extremist organisations,’ most notably the Egyptian Islamic Jihad and the Gama’a Islamiya [Islamic Group].”

Egyptian security forces crushed groups that targeted tourists, Christians, government ministers and other officials in a 1990s campaign for a purist Islamic state, and has kept a tight lid on them since.

The Brotherhood once had a secret paramilitary section, but it now says it is committed to promoting its policies through peaceful, democratic means. The government has been unable to prove any serious act of violence orchestrated by the movement’s leadership for more than 50 years.

Mubarak, in an ABC interview on Thursday, blamed the Brotherhood for violence that erupted on Wednesday during protests in Cairo’s central Tahrir Square. Independent witnesses said Mubarak supporters launched the attacks.

Suleiman, then Mubarak’s top spymaster, was speaking to FBI director Robert Mueller, who was visiting Cairo in February 2006, the 2006 cable says.

The cable, which uses the spelling Soliman, said he had told Mueller that the Brotherhood was “neither a religious organisation, nor a social organization, nor a political party, but a combination of all three”.

The cable went on: “The principal danger, in Soliman’s view, was the group’s exploitation of religion to influence and mobilise the public.”

“Soliman termed the MB’s recent success in the parliamentary elections as ‘unfortunate’, adding his view that although the group was technically illegal, existing Egyptian laws were insufficient to keep the MB in check.”

The cable was referring to parliamentary elections in November and December of 2005 in which the Brotherhood made strong gains, although Mubarak’s National Democratic Party kept a big majority.

Iranian ‘threat’
In a cable dated January 2 2008, Ricciardone reported Suleiman as saying that Iran remained “a significant threat to Egypt”.

Successive US administrations have seen Mubarak’s government as a bulwark against Iran’s influence in the Arab world, a perception the Egyptian leader has used to his benefit in securing billions of dollars in military aid.

“Iran is supporting Jihad and spoiling peace, and has supported extremists in Egypt previously. If they were to support the Muslim Brotherhood this would make them ‘our enemy’,” the ambassador reported Suleiman as saying.

In a cable dated October 25 2007, Ricciardone said Suleiman “takes an especially hard line on Tehran” and frequently refers to the Iranians as “devils”.

The cables suggest US officials have consistently responded skeptically to the Egyptian government’s dire warnings about the Brotherhood.

In a November 29 2005, cable to Mueller before his visit, Ricciardone said Egyptian authorities “have a long history of threatening us with the MB bogeyman”.

“Your counterparts may try to suggest that [then President George Bush’s] insistence on greater democracy in Egypt is somehow responsible for the MB’s electoral success,” he wrote. “You should push back that, on the contrary, the MB’s rise signals the need for greater democracy and transparency in government.”

“The images of intimidation and fraud that have emerged from the recent elections favour the extremists both we and the Egyptian government oppose. The best way to counter narrow-minded Islamist politics is to open the system.”

In a follow up cable on January 29 2006, Ricciardone seemed to foreshadow the current unrest when he wrote to Mueller: “We do not accept the proposition that Egypt’s only choices are a slow-to-reform authoritarian regime or an Islamist extremist one; nor do we see greater democracy in Egypt as leading necessarily to a government under the MB.” – Reuters