/ 6 June 2012

China bugged by smug foreign smog logs

Smog weighs down city life on a main street of Linfen
Smog weighs down city life on a main street of Linfen

Foreign embassies that issue air pollution readings are acting illegally and interfering in its internal business.

China tightened monitoring standards in January but many Beijing residents remain sceptical about official pollution information in the capital.

The US embassy’s hourly tweets of air quality readings from its own equipment have become a cherished alternative reference point for almost 20 000 followers.

Official forecasts often predict light pollution even when the city is shrouded in haze – actual data is only issued 24 hours later – but the US tweets frequently offer “bad”, “hazardous” and even “crazy bad” verdicts.

“According to the Vienna convention on diplomatic relations … foreign diplomats are required to respect and follow local laws and cannot interfere in internal affairs,” Deputy Environment Minister Wu Xiaoqing told a press conference on Tuesday.

“China’s air quality monitoring and information release involve the public interest and are up to the government. Foreign consulates in China taking it on themselves to monitor air quality and release the information online not only goes against the spirit of the Vienna Convention … it also contravenes relevant environmental protection rules.”

He argued it was unfair to judge Chinese air by the standards of the US Environmental Protection Agency – the basis for the embassy tweets – given China’s current stage of development.

Foreign ministry spokesperson Liu Weimin urged foreign missions to respect China’s laws and stop issuing the data, especially over the internet.

He said collecting information for staff and diplomats was not a problem, but added: “They can’t release this information to the outside world.”

According to a WikiLeaks cable, Chinese diplomats complained to US counterparts about the feed in 2009, saying it might confuse the Chinese public.

Previously, officials have argued that the US reading is unscientific because it is based on a single monitoring point.

Richard Buangan, the US embassy spokesperson, said it made data available to the US community in the capital and the Shanghai monitor was “an unofficial resource for the health of the consulate community”. – © Guardian News and Media 2012