Debate in your own tongue, if at all

For a quality debate, parties should give us their best debaters and each must debate in a language of their choice, as is their right. (Delwyn Verasamy, M&G)

For a quality debate, parties should give us their best debaters and each must debate in a language of their choice, as is their right. (Delwyn Verasamy, M&G)

In SA parties are elected, not individuals. Why, then, do we have the insistent hype about a debate between President Jacob Zuma and Helen Zille?

? To mimic the United States? It is the ANC and not the president that has a pact with the electorate. Change the electoral system if you want to foreground individuals ("<a href="http://mg.co.za/article/2012-10-19-00-ten-things-about-presidential-debates" target="_blank">10 things about presidential debates</a>", October 19).

For a quality debate, parties should give us their best debaters and each must debate in a language of their choice, as is their right.

The assumption is that a debate between Zuma and Zille would be in English. But it is oppressive to impose a single language out of a possible 11. If you took away the linguistic advantage and thus levelled the playing fields, the strident calls for a debate might not be so strong.

Language can make a fool look smart and a smart person look foolish. The moment you speak English, you bow and kowtow to the master and to the values and world view embedded in the language.

I am not against any particular language, but I do become concerned when language becomes an agent of disempowerment. &ndash; Dr Masitha Hoeane, Pretoria East

Topics In This Story

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

Client Media Releases

South African tops FleetBoard Drivers' League 2015
AfroCentric renovates Charlotte Maxeke Hospital classrooms
MTN intensifying network improvement
SA's road transport sector under threat
Spectacular growth in tourism: Hanekom