National

Livid Vavi says Cosatu charges leaked to spark 'media trial'

Staff Reporter, Andisiwe Makinana

Cosatu's suspended general secretary has, on Twitter, accused his detractors of leaking his charge sheet to instigate a trial by media against him.

Suspended Cosatu general secretary Zwelinzima Vavi. (Madelene Cronje, M&G)

Zwelinzima Vavi on Saturday morning hit back at his enemies within the Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu), saying the charges against him were leaked to the media to "conduct a media trial" and dent his reputation. He also said he would not "fall in a trap of answering [trumped up] charges on social media", demanding that evidence be brought forward "in a correct forum".

On Friday, the Mail & Guardian reported that the leadership of the country's biggest labour federation wants its suspended general secretary fired from his position without any notice.

While it has been clear that Vavi's star at Cosatu was rapidly waning, the charge sheet presented to him this week confirmed that the federation wants him out.

Cosatu finally charged Vavi this week, almost five months after it suspended him on August 15 last year, for having an affair with a junior Cosatu employee.

The M&G is in possession of the 33-page charge sheet dated January 13 2014.

Vavi's penchant for taking to Twitter about his strife with Cosatu might have come back to bite him. A number of Vavi's Twitter followers had over the months advised him to be discreet and not to air so much of his views on the social media platform, but he had repeatedly ignored them.

Thirteen of his tweets between September and December 2013 have been cited in the charge sheet as evidence of derogatory statements undermining the federation, its leadership and its policies.

Vavi is facing nine charges:

  • Recruitment and employment of the junior Cosatu employee without going through the relevant challenges;
  • Relationship with the Cosatu employee;
  • The conversion of the junior to permanent employee;
  • Supervision of the woman he was accused of having an affair with – alleged failure by Vavi to supervise her work performance has allegedly led to travel expenses amounting to R483 737 in 2012 and R778 624 in 2013 not accounted for;
  • Distribution of internal grievance and response on Twitter before Cosatu could hear the grievance;
  • Personal expenses and personal travel paid for using a Cosatu credit card;
  • Claiming during a Carte Blanche interview that the administrative secretary of Cosatu had interviewed the junior employee for her position;
  • Breach of suspension conditions; and
  • Utterances derogatory of Cosatu and its leadership, which include a statement posted on Numsa's website shortly after Vavi was suspended in which he questioned the motive of his suspension.

On the charge of using a Cosatu credit card for personal expenses and personal travel, Vavi is accused of insisting between March and July 2012, that his and his family's travel expenses be paid for by Cosatu.

He also allegedly used the federation's credit card for a massage at a Johannesburg hotel.

"At your insistence a charge for services rendered to you by a body therapist at the Parktonian Protea Hotel on May 23 2013 was paid by Cosatu in the amount of R1 500," it reads.

"A ticket for Noluthando Vavi [your wife] flying from Johannesburg to Cape Town on March 28 2012 in the net amount of R7 180 for the Jazz Festival, which amount was paid with a Cosatu credit card.

"Accommodation at the Nova Constantia Boutique Hotel for the Jazz Festival during the period March 28 2012 to April 1 2012 in the net amount of R14 128 for you and Noluthando Vavi."

Cosatu lists seven other occasions where Vavi's wife and two other relatives flew between Johannesburg and Cape Town, Johannesburg and East London and Johannesburg and Durban in 2012, with air tickets bought using a Cosatu credit card.

"The expenses reflected in the above paragraphs were not refunded by you." Cosatu claims the expenses were incurred without the knowledge or authorisation of the deputy general secretary or the national office bearers of Cosatu. "… [W]ere incurred at a time when to your knowledge the NOBs had decided in the context of Cosatu's serious cash flow problems, that no personal expenses would be incurred by Cosatu on behalf of its national office bearers."

Cosatu alleged that the expenses were incurred and processed on Vavi's behalf by the woman he allegedly had an extra-marital relationship with.

Serious misconduct
In the charge sheet, Cosatu states that in respect of each of the charges, Vavi is guilty of serious misconduct because he intentionally, or alternatively recklessly or negligently acted in breach of his general duties and responsibilities as an employee of the federation and as its general secretary as set out in Cosatu's constitution and policies.

At the disciplinary hearing, the date of which will still be determined, the federation will submit that Vavi is guilty as charged and "having regard to the gravity of the charges" but subject to the findings of the chairperson of the hearing, Cosatu will move for his summary dismissal.

The disciplinary inquiry will be chaired by one of the country's top legal minds, advocate Wim Trengove SC, who will be authorised to make findings on all the charges put to Vavi and also decide on the appropriate sanction.

The federation said the decision to appoint an external chairperson and to permit legal representation at the inquiry was taken by Cosatu in the light of the fact that Vavi occupies a very senior position within the labour federation and because "it is manifestly desirable that the charges should be heard before and determined by an independent person".

"Please be advised that Cosatu considers the charges against you to be grave and destructive of the working relationship between it and yourself.

"Subject of course to the findings of the chairperson [Trengove] it is the intention of Cosatu to move for your summary dismissal in the event of a finding of guilt in respect of one or more of them," reads the charge sheet.

Vavi will be allowed legal representation at the inquiry. – Additional reporting by Andisiwe Makinana


Topics In This Section

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus