Kenya's presidential hopefuls are amongst a group of people called by the ICC to stand trial for ordering rapes and murders after a disputed election.
Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya’s finance minister and son of the country’s founding president, must stand trial at the International Criminal Court for directing a militia to murder and rape after a disputed 2007 election, ICC judges ruled on Monday.
They also ruled that three more Kenyans, including former minister William Ruto, must face trial along with Kenyatta for crimes against humanity during post-election violence that killed at least 1 220 people.
The decision by the Hague-based court is likely to have far-reaching consequences for the biggest economy in East Africa, a graft-prone country where a powerful political elite have long been considered almost above the law.
Both Kenyatta, who was ranked Kenya’s richest man by Forbes magazine and Ruto, a former higher education minister, plan to run for president in an election due by March next year at the latest and the ruling could hurt their ambitions.
“It’s a great thing in terms of the fight against impunity in the country for those who have been found to have a case to answer,” anti-corruption campaigner John Githongo told Reuters.
“It means they have joined an exclusive small club of individuals who have had questions to answer before the entire world with regard to crimes against humanity ... Ratko Mladic, Charles Taylor ... That’s not polite company at all.”
Ruto said he found the ruling strange, would appeal against it and run for president anyway. There was no immediate reaction from Kenyatta, who said on Sunday he too would still run for the presidency whatever the ICC outcome.
Some analysts said while the ICC stressed the accused were innocent until proven guilty, Kenyatta would come under pressure to quit as finance minister and a deputy prime minister and that his and Ruto’s presidential campaigns could suffer.
“While they would dearly love to fight on, the sheer practicalities of facing trial may make it impossible to run, not to speak of the major question marks over their integrity in the eyes of the electorate and their political backers,” said Patrick Mair, an analyst at Control Risks.
The ruling could lead to demonstrations in Kenya, although there were no immediate outbreaks of protest in Kenyatta’s constituency, nor in Ruto’s Rift Valley powerbase.
There are two Kenyan cases at the ICC, split broadly between the ethnic Kalenjin and Kikuyu camps involved in much of the violence. Ruto is a Kalenjin and Kenyatta is a Kikuyu, Kenya’s largest ethnic group.
The ICC’s decision could backfire on another presidential contender, Prime Minister Raila Odinga, who is accused by Kenyatta and Ruto supporters of trying to exploit the criminal charges for his own political gain.
Kenyan radio presenter Joshua arap Sang and the head of Kenya’s civil service Francis Muthaura must also stand trial, the ICC judges ruled. Sang, too, said he would use all legal means to contest the ICC decision.
But the chamber said there was insufficient evidence to confirm charges against Henry Kosgey, former industrialisation minister and Mohammed Hussein Ali, who was police commissioner at the time of the violence.
‘Justice has been done’
Some victims welcomed the ruling while others said the courts should really be trying the people who carried out the attacks that drove hundreds of thousands from their homes.
“Justice has been done,” said Harrisson Macharia, whose daughter was killed when a mob of machete wielding Ruto supporters herded women and children into a church and set it ablaze on New Year’s Day 2008.
“We want justice for everyone who was victimised by the violence,” he said. “We victims are now satisfied with the outcome. We suffered a lot, and we are now waiting for the trial.”
Outside where the church used to be in Kiambaa, near the Rift Valley town of Eldoret, there are 36, weathered wooden crosses standing just under knee height, some disappearing under long grass; 24 of them say only “RIP Unknown”.
In a camp for the displaced near Naivasha, Samuel Mathenge said those who carried out the attacks were well known to them, and they should be the ones to face trial.
“The decision by the ICC has surprised us as the guilty have been let go scot-free while the innocent have a case to answer,” said Mathenge, a Kikuyu.
“The only thing left is to pray for Uhuru as he came to our aid at the height of the violence and hope at the end he will be found innocent,” he said.—Reuters