Debate in your own tongue, if at all

For a quality debate, parties should give us their best debaters and each must debate in a language of their choice, as is their right. (Delwyn Verasamy, M&G)

For a quality debate, parties should give us their best debaters and each must debate in a language of their choice, as is their right. (Delwyn Verasamy, M&G)

? To mimic the United States? It is the ANC and not the president that has a pact with the electorate. Change the electoral system if you want to foreground individuals ("<a href="http://mg.co.za/article/2012-10-19-00-ten-things-about-presidential-debates" target="_blank">10 things about presidential debates</a>", October 19).

For a quality debate, parties should give us their best debaters and each must debate in a language of their choice, as is their right.

The assumption is that a debate between Zuma and Zille would be in English. But it is oppressive to impose a single language out of a possible 11. If you took away the linguistic advantage and thus levelled the playing fields, the strident calls for a debate might not be so strong.

Language can make a fool look smart and a smart person look foolish. The moment you speak English, you bow and kowtow to the master and to the values and world view embedded in the language.

I am not against any particular language, but I do become concerned when language becomes an agent of disempowerment. &ndash; Dr Masitha Hoeane, Pretoria East

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

Client Media Releases

Narrowing the intention-behaviour gap
Imperial reports flat revenue
MTN's school connectivity programme reaches Namaqualand
Rosebank College initiates Graduate Empowerment Programme
Oxbridge Academy partners with ADvTECH Group
Why future success belongs to the first movers...
Ipsos pre-election forecasting on the mark nationally
Office 365 a one-stop-shop for e-mail compliance