Illegal fishing starves West African economies

Sierra Leonean security forces guard the Marampa 803, a vessel apprehended for alleged illegal fishing activities, that has been moored off the West African country's capital Freetown. (REUTERS/Simon Akam)

Sierra Leonean security forces guard the Marampa 803, a vessel apprehended for alleged illegal fishing activities, that has been moored off the West African country's capital Freetown. (REUTERS/Simon Akam)

Catastrophic levels of illegal fishing in West Africa are costing the region millions in lost revenue and hundreds of thousands of jobs, a development think-tank said this week. 

Countries such as Senegal, Sierra Leone and Mauritania are missing out on vital income because of the masses of fish being taken from their waters by trawlers from as far afield as South Korea, according to research by the United Kingdom’s Overseas Development  Institute (ODI).

Senegal lost $300-million, or 2% of its gross domestic product, to the practice in 2012, and Sierra Leone, one of the region’s poorest nations, lost out on $29-million, according to the report, titled Western Africa’s Missing Fish.

A lack of government transparency in the region, limited capacity to patrol the seas and legal loopholes once West Africa’s fish arrive in Europe, its biggest market, contributed to the situation, the report’s author, Alfonso Daniels, said. 

“It’s a huge problem and it’s only getting worse.” West Africa’s illegally caught fish are transported in giant refrigerated containers mixed with other cargo to escape scrutiny at ports, Daniels said.

“Four-fifths are coming through container ships and [they] are not considered at all by the anti-illegal fishing legislation of the European Union, which is the largest market for fish in the world,” he said.

But despite this loophole, the EU remains a leader in sanctioning producers of illegal fish. And a series of opaque agreements between West African nations and the likes of Russia, China and South Korea mean that the scale of the region’s “missing fish” could be much larger.

“Fisheries agreements … should be public and openly available as they are with the European Union,” Daniels said.

If Africa fished its own waters rather than striking shady deals with other countries, more money would flow into the governments’ coffers.

The sale of fishing rights to foreign operatives netted Africa $400-million in 2014, according to the United Nations’s Food and Agriculture Organisation, but could in theory generate $3.3-billion if the continent’s own fleets caught and exported the fish.

Another practical step to combat the problem would be to create a blacklist of illegal vessels. The ODI report estimated that more than 300 000 new jobs could be created if measures such as a global tracking system for fishing vessels was instituted, loopholes were closed and a blacklist created. 

“Further development benefits would derive from increased export revenue. Sustainable management of fisheries resources would also strengthen food security,” the report said. 

Achieving “marine environmental sustainability” would stop permanently depleting endangered stocks and would provide a long-term income, it said. — AFP

 

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

Client Media Releases

Pharmaceutical warehouses keep cool with Imperial
NWU Mafikeng Campus holds annual Excellence Awards
MTN's acquisition of Smart Village is finalised
Sanral acts against irregular expenditure