HSBC was cut loose for pricey, less experienced Harith

In the stiff tender process, HSBC reportedly trumped the likes of Absa, Standard Bank, PwC and KPMG. (Reuters)

In the stiff tender process, HSBC reportedly trumped the likes of Absa, Standard Bank, PwC and KPMG. (Reuters)

This included, in large part, an attempt to buy a network of petrol stations in South Africa.

In the stiff tender process, HSBC reportedly trumped the likes of Absa, Standard Bank, PwC and KPMG.

Appointed as PetroSA's "transaction adviser", HSBC was to be paid on a contingency basis, meaning it would be paid only if it could find a seller, negotiate a good purchase fee, raise funds and successfully close the deal. At a success fee of 0.25%, this was still a lucrative prospect. Should PetroSA buy a petrol marketing company for R14-billion, for example, HSBC would earn R35-million.

HSBC was able to find a willing seller and make headway on price negotiations, but in 2011, newly appointed acting chief executive Yekani Tenza had the contract terminated.

More coverage…

R1bn scandal rocks PetroSA
PetroSA's murky Ghana oil deal
Zuma family rumour stokes PetroSA fire

As a result, PetroSA had to pay a R19-million cancellation fee, which auditors have since recognised as "fruitless and wasteful".

Instead, the firm Harith Fund Managers was appointed for a 2.65% success fee, which would have earned Harith about R371-million, more than 10 times what HSBC would have earned.
In addition, it was to earn a monthly retainer of R1.3-million.

This appointment was made without any tender process. The chief of finance, Nkosemntu Nika, later complained that he had been "kept away" from this decision, which he said was "questionable".

Nika voiced his concerns at a board meeting last year. According to the minutes, he said he had never agreed to these costs: "The appointment of Harith was questionable as the latter had no capacity at the time of the appointment." Nika argued that Harith had only employed advisers on the project after it was appointed by PetroSA: "Based on this, it is clear that Harith was not appointed on their experience in this field."

The board agreed that the fees were excessive and that they should be renegotiated.

It is understood that Harith's success fee was negotiated down to 1.7%, with a ceiling of R187-million.

Now connections between Harith's chief executive Tshepo Mahloele and lawyer George Sabelo have raised eyebrows (See "Zuma family rumour stokes PetroSA fire"). PetroSA first appointed Sabelo, who was not on the company's panel of attorneys, to advise it on issues related to the termination of HSBC's contract and Harith's appointment.

* Got a tip-off for us about this story? Email [email protected] The M&G Centre for Investigative Journalism, a non-profit initiative to develop investigative journalism in the public interest, produced this story. All views are ours. See for our stories, activities and funding sources.

Client Media Releases

Technology that will change the face of corporate travel in SA in 2019
Fedgroup drives industry reform in unclaimed benefits sector
Hardworking students win big at architecture awards
VUT presents 2019 registration introduction