To enjoy the full Mail & Guardian online experience: please upgrade your browser
Carien du Plessis
19 Feb 2016 08:38
President Jacob Zuma during the 2016 State of the Nation address debate. (David Harrison, M&G)
This Thursday, unlike the previous one, there were no overt threats of violence and no planned marches as President Jacob Zuma addressed the joint-sitting of Parliament.
Barbed wire was erected in some areas, but security forces probably wanted
to be safe rather than sorry. The marching masses of last week never pitched
and the barbed wire was removed the moment Zuma finished speaking.
After all the drama of last week, it felt almost like a non-event.
Nkandla was the elephant in the room, but this time around Zuma didn’t
have to say anything about it.
It was all dealt with in the Constitutional
Court the week before, when his lawyers admitted that public protector Thuli
Madonsela’s recommendations meant that Zuma had to pay back some money for the
security upgrades to his home in KwaZulu-Natal.
Functional debateThis left room for actual debate, although opposition parties still
exploited the Nkandla matter and Zuma’s improperly close relationship with the
business-minded Gupta family.
Zuma’s defenders on the back benches also remained seated.
Instead, when ANC MPs spoke, it was to ridicule the opposition, notably
EFF leader Julius Malema, and to defend government programmes that were
questioned by the opposition.
Economic Development Minister Ebrahim Patel, for instance, outlined
government’s plans for economic recovery and development, while Energy Minister
Tina Joemat-Pettersson spoke about renewable energy programmes and the need for
Even some opposition MPs took to defending Zuma, like one of Agang’s two
representatives, Andries Tlouamma, who said when Zuma is criticised, it should
be “with love”. His praise was such that he created the impression that he
mistakenly believed floor-crossing still exists.
DA leader Mmusi Maimane themed his attack on Zuma by insinuating the
president was so out of touch with reality for the upgrades to his home and for
his apparent paranoia about the EFF, that he lived on “Planet Zuma”. Unlike the
EFF’s war cry of “Zupta must go”, this metaphor didn’t trend.
Cope leader Mosiuoa Lekota hit a nerve when he spoke about “factions” in
Parliament and was ruled out of order by the presiding officer, Raseriti Tau. A
tussle ensued between DA chief whip John Steenhuisen and Tau after Steenhuisen
accused Tau of “talking rubbish”.
Lekota argued that one faction in Parliament was made up of “two or
three parties with the presiding officers” while the other was a smaller
faction “trying to keep the executive accountable”. He said the legislature was
held to ransom by the presiding officers who believed their function was to
shield the executive.
In this way, he subtly exploited the reported unhappiness of some ANC
MPs over Zuma’s U-turn on Nkandla.
Zuma respondsBy the time Zuma delivered his reply, the EFF was no longer in the
chamber – Malema and his caucus left because they said they didn’t want to take part in an “illegitimate” debate.
Some diplomats, attending the debate for the first time, even remarked
that Zuma sounded “statesman-like” in his reply. Perhaps it was just because he
was given time to speak and he wasn’t humiliated, like during his Sona the week
before, by cries of “Zupta must fall”.
As in most other years, Zuma’s reply sounded more confident than his
actual Sona, and he made all the right noises. He sympathised with the pain of
the families of the trapped miners in Baberton. He explained the economic
crisis – in Zulu – in a way that signalled that, this time, he actually gets it
and he gave reassurances that his government would do all it could to avoid a ratings downgrade which would make economic growth difficult. He commended
Maimane for the way he drew the attention away from the EFF during the Sona and
onto the 8.3-million jobless in the country – a rare mention by the president to
an opposition leader.
He gave assurances that the National Development Plan would be
implemented, something that would boost business confidence.
Heckling was kept to a minimum, except for some murmurs when Zuma
said governance at state-owned enterprises would be improved and the right
people with proper qualifications would be appointed. MPs are well aware of
reports of Zuma’s personal closeness to controversial South African Airways chairperson
Zuma set the tone for a government that was serious about getting the
economy right. Whether there is any substance to his promises will become
apparent next Wednesday, when Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan shows us the money.
Create Account | Lost Your Password?