Biblical in its uncontrolled rage and scope, the storm has left millions of Americans to scavenge for food and shelter, and hundreds reportedly dead. With its main levee broken, the evacuated city of New Orleans has become part of the Gulf of Mexico. But the damage wrought by Hurricane Katrina may not entirely be the result of an act of nature.
A year ago the United States army corps of engineers proposed to study how New Orleans could be protected from a catastrophic hurricane, but the George W Bush administration ordered that the research not be undertaken. After a flood killed six people in 1995, the Congress created the Southeast Louisiana Urban Flood Control Project. Operated by the corps of engineers, levees and pumping stations were strengthened and renovated.
In 2001, when Bush became president, the Federal Emergency Management Agency issued a report stating that a hurricane striking New Orleans was one of the three most likely potential disasters — after a terrorist attack on New York City.
But by 2003 the federal funding essentially dried up as it was drained into the Iraq war. By last year the Bush administration cut the corps of engineers’ request for holding back the waters of Lake Pontchartrain by more than 80%.
By the beginning of this year, the administration’s additional cuts, reduced by 44% since 2001, forced the corps to impose a hiring freeze. The Senate debated adding funds for fixing levees, but it was too late.
The New Orleans Times-Picayune, which, before the hurricane, published a series on the federal funding problem, has reported: ”No one can say they didn’t see it coming … Now in the wake of one of the worst storms ever, serious questions are being asked about the lack of preparation.”
The Bush administration’s policy of turning over wetlands to developers has almost certainly contributed to the heightened level of the storm surge. In 1990 a federal task force began restoring lost wetlands around New Orleans. Every 3km of wetland between the Crescent City and the Gulf reduces a surge by 15cm. Bush promised a ”no net loss” wetland policy, which had been launched by his father’s administration and bolstered by Bill Clinton. But Bush reversed the approach in 2003, unleashing the developers.
The army corps of engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency announced they could no longer protect wetlands unless they were somehow related to interstate commerce.
In response to this potential crisis, four leading environmental groups conducted a study that concluded last year that without wetlands protection New Orleans could be devastated by an ordinary — much less a category four or five — hurricane. ”There’s no way to describe how mindless a policy that is when it comes to wetlands protection,” said one of the report’s authors.
The chairperson of the White House’s council on environmental quality dismissed the study as ”highly questionable”, and boasted: ”Everybody loves what we’re doing.”
”My administration’s climate change policy will be science-based,” Bush declared. But in 2002, when the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) submitted a study on global warming to the United Nations, reflecting its expert research, Bush derided it as ”a report put out by a bureaucracy”, and excised the climate change assessment from its annual report.
The next year, when the EPA issued its first comprehensive Report on the Environment, stating: ”Climate change has global consequences for human health and the environment,” the White House simply removed the line and all such conclusions.
At the G8 meeting in Gleneagles this year, Bush stymied any common action on global warming. But scientists have continued to accumulate impressive data on the rising temperature of the oceans, producing more severe hurricanes.
In February 60 scientists warned in a statement, Restoring Scientific Integrity in Policymaking: ”Successful application of science has played a large part in the policies that have made the US the world’s most powerful nation and its citizens increasingly prosperous and healthy … Indeed, this principle has long been adhered to by presidents and administrations of both parties in forming and implementing policies. The administration of George W Bush has, however, disregarded this principle … The distortion of scientific knowledge for partisan political ends must cease …” Bush ignored the statement.
In the two weeks preceding the storm, the trumping of science by ideology and expertise by special interests accelerated. The Federal Drug Administration (FDA) announced it was postponing sale of the morning-after pill, despite overwhelming scientific evidence of its safety and approval by the FDA’s scientific advisory board.
The UN special envoy for HIV/Aids in Africa accused the Bush administration of responsibility for a condom shortage in Uganda as a result of pushing its evangelical Christian agenda of ”abstinence”. The chief of the board of justice statistics in the Justice Department was ordered by the White House to delete its study showing that African-Americans and minorities are subject to racial profiling in police traffic stops. He refused to concede and was forced to quit.
When the army’s chief contracting oversight analyst objected to a $7-billion no-bid contract awarded for work in Iraq to Halliburton, she was demoted despite her superior professional ratings.
On the day the levee burst in New Orleans, Bush delivered a speech comparing the Iraq war to World War II and himself to Franklin D Roosevelt: ”And he knew that the best way to bring peace and stability to the region was by bringing freedom to Japan.” Bush had boarded his very own Streetcar Named Desire. — Â