I have recently arrived in the New South Africa, and I was wondering what is the point of your column entitled “Body Language”? As a gender specialist, I do not see the purpose of employing an archaic “inyour-face” tone as a method toward greater awareness in tackling gender-related issues. It is more likely that you repel your readers than inform them.
Perhaps it would be more practical if the column addressed questions like: why is rape so prolific as a form of violent crime in South Africa as compared with other African nations? It could even suggest names and places where both men and women could seek assistance. This is of course assuming that your goal is not to make light of serious inequalities in South Africa and around the globe.
I think it is wonderful if women feel comfortable enough with their bodies to reveal all. But after all, crediting Madonna as a symbol of women’s empowerment is a bit naive. She, like the new and improved models (Britney Spears, etc), is a caricature of herself branded and sold. It is kind of shallow and superficial to think that wearing a see-through dress is a declaration of independence or a method of feminist rebellion. It is as misguided as promoting images of the terminator, Arnold Schwarzenegger, as a measure of masculinity.
Honestly, what do women really have to thank Madonna for? Nicole Demestihas, US