War, at what cost?

Every four years the world puts aside its disputes to cheer on its athletes during the Olympic Games. During this Olympic year, however, we’ve been treated to a spectacle that has been anything but uplifting, as Russian tanks, troops and planes have swept across the border of one of its small neighbours. Although the neighbour was Georgia, not Czechoslovakia, and the tanks bore Russian, not Soviet Union, markings, the scene was chillingly reminiscent of 1968.

The aftermath of these events has been equally disturbing. Russian troops have refused so far to leave and have dug in to positions not only in Georgia’s disputed areas of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, but also in Georgia proper, all in violation of Georgia’s territorial integrity.

The world’s attention is now focused on two urgent objectives: bringing a halt to all hostilities and abuses in the conflict area, including those committed by “irregulars” in Russian-controlled areas, and helping the survivors of the conflict.

Both Georgia and Russia have signed a ceasefire agreement, but the world is still waiting for Russia to honour it.

Meanwhile, there is an urgent need to allow humanitarian workers in. The US and other countries have begun delivering medical care and supplies, food, shelter and other assistance to the survivors. While the exact number of dead and wounded is still unknown, it is clear that the people of Georgia are facing a humanitarian crisis in the swathe of destruction left behind.

Georgia’s separatist regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia have had a long history of tension. But anyone who takes a closer look at the events of the past year should not be surprised by what has happened in the past few weeks. Moscow has been steadily intensifying pressure on Georgia economically, politically and militarily, launching trade embargos and suspending air and ground transport links. In the spring Russia issued a government order to increase its official ties with the breakaway regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, bypassing the Georgian authorities.

Russia’s challenges then became more ominous. Last April a Russian fighter jet shot down a Georgian drone over Georgian airspace and, in that same month, Russian combat troops and artillery began moving into Abkhazia, all on the pretext of augmenting the peacekeeping force — but without any consultation with Georgia. In May Russia sent railroad construction troops into Abkhazia — with no apparent legal mandate — to repair the railway leading south from Russia to the conflict zone, ostensibly for “humanitarian reasons”. By July incidents of violence were occurring in South Ossetia, including attacks on Georgian police vehicles and an attempted assassination of a pro-Georgian South Ossetian leader.

Throughout this period, US officials urged the Russian and Georgian governments to exercise restraint and find a way to resolve their differences peacefully. On August 7, after Georgia responded to shelling of Georgian villages that came from Russian peacekeeper-controlled territory in South Ossetia and moved to reclaim parts of South Ossetia, an overwhelming Russian force swarmed through South Ossetia and into Abkhazia — and Georgia — proper.

Russia is now questioning Georgia’s territorial integrity and this week Russian President Dmitri Medvedev signed a decree recognising the independence of both disputed areas, despite numerous UN Security Council resolutions aimed at resolving their status diplomatically.

The scenes of Russian aggression — and now the threats against other countries such as Poland and Ukraine — have brought back frightening memories to the former captive states, which have since chosen a Western model of freedom and democracy. But the world we live in today is different from that of 1968, when the Soviet Union invaded Czechoslovakia. Since then, Europe, the transatlantic community and the world have moved forward. Russia has sought to integrate into the diplomatic, political, economic and security structures of the 21st century, and the US has strongly supported those efforts.

But through its actions Russia has put its international reputation and aspirations at risk. The effect of its actions is already being felt as questions are being raised about Russia’s suitability for admission into the World Trade Organisation, and the prestige of an eighth seat at the G7 economic forum. Some critics are even questioning the appropriateness of Russia hosting the next Winter Olympics in Sochi, which is only a marathon’s race away from the disputed territory of Abkhazia. The Russian people may learn that the cost of the recent aggression- will be measured in ways that their leaders never considered.

If Russia wants to repair the damage to its reputation — and to its relations with the rest of the world — it must respect the ceasefire its president has signed and stop all hostilities. In accordance with the terms of that ceasefire, it must remove from Georgia the troops it introduced after August 6. It must also permit international monitors and a more robust international presence in South Ossetia, allow humanitarian aid to be delivered and adhere to Russia’s previously professed policy of supporting Georgia’s territorial integrity.

Without those actions, Russia will further isolate itself. As Rice said after the Nato meeting: “There can be no business as usual with Russia while this kind of activity is going on.”

Eric M Bost is ambassador of the United States to South Africa

We make it make sense

If this story helped you navigate your world, subscribe to the M&G today for just R30 for the first three months

Subscribers get access to all our best journalism, subscriber-only newsletters, events and a weekly cryptic crossword.”

Related stories

WELCOME TO YOUR M&G

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

Advertising

Latest stories

‘It takes two to tango’: The private sector must ’fess...

During a webinar on Wednesday, the group chief executive of EOH, Stephen van Coller, called private sector participation in the Zondo commission into state capture ‘disappointing’

Maasai land in Tanzania earmarked for UAE royals

Protracted effort by authorities to evict the pastoralists in Loliondo for safari tourism has led to violent confrontation

A stylish way to pay

Steve Jobs said, “The best way to create value in the 21st century is to connect creativity with technology”. A fact leading African tech...

South Africa among countries where debt collection is most difficult

Some small to medium businesses are taking as long as 180 days to settle debts, according to an assessment by international insurer Allianz Trade
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…
×