/ 2 November 2010

Revenge of the spendables

Revenge Of The Spendables

At the beginning of my graphic novel, Red, retired CIA killer Paul Moses (the corporate spooks of the Bourne films would have called him an “asset”) is living as quietly as possible, suffering night terrors alone and waiting out his time as best he can.

The only relationship he has is with the agency clerk who deals with his pension. She doesn’t know what his job was and he never wants her to find out.

At the beginning of the film adaptation of Red, retired CIA killer Frank Moses is trying to adapt to a boring life and is engaged in a hapless long-distance almost-flirtation with the agency clerk who deals with his pension. She doesn’t know what his job was, and he can’t tell her.

In both versions Moses is a man who believes his life is essentially over. In both versions a CIA strike team tries to kill him in the middle of the night for reasons unknown. In both versions he evades death, kills the strike team almost without thinking — and suddenly, horribly, has his life back.

The allure of the idea is right here.

No matter how done you think you are, one day something might happen that makes you prove yourself to be just as good as you always were. There is great emotional and dramatic power in the concept of the Hero Rising Again.

Look at the recent Rambo film, variously titled Rambo and John Rambo. When we first meet Sylvester Stallone in that film, he frankly looks like a skinned heifer that someone left out in the rain for six weeks.

He’s not Rambo. He’s “John”, and he’s old, monosyllabic to the point of catatonia, defeated. Things have to get horrendous before he becomes Rambo again — much like the Bourne persona asserting itself when Matt Damon is attacked by cops in The Bourne Identity — and the audience takes perverse joy in the retired man taking on that aspect of the demented Special Forces black-ops killer “asset” we know of old.

These stories tell us we cannot be dispensed with, that it’s wrong when we’re discarded, that we’ll have one last chance to win.

A dear friend of mine was visiting her parents at a remote American farm for their big annual party. All their friends turned up, friends made through a lifetime at various levels of law enforcement. Cops, spooks, military types. And my friend was delighted to tell me that they talked for ages about wanting to see Red. Not so much because I’m an immortal genius or because they know we’re friends, but because it’s that rare thing — a movie that’s about their generations not being done yet.

It’s also about the actors they matured with continuing their own narratives, which shouldn’t be dismissed — Hollywood film is so pervasive that their narratives weave around ours and the meta-story of “Bruce Willis, action hero” is at least as real to us as the freaks paraded around on reality television.

This story form’s most insidious iteration is the divorced dad of Taken — discarded papa is a retired CIA “preventer” who has to revive his old skills to save his kid while his former wife and her new smarmy, rich husband stand helplessly by — she threw me out and the kid won’t do as I tell her, so I have to save the day by throat-punching a lot of weird foreign people.

The converse is just as compelling, in its way — the engine driving the Bourne films is that, in a time of email and ubiquitous mobile phones, people just won’t leave us the hell alone, and maybe one day we, like Jason Bourne, will get sick of it and kick the crap out of all of them.

But these films under the theme of “the return of the retired operative” share a common emotional stance that is very pleasing to us — that maybe we were right, after all, and maybe we really were good, and it’ll be a fine thing to prove it again.

The allure is universal enough that The Expendables, the last hurrah of Stallone’s team of ageing hard-man mercenaries, is headed towards a cumulative pot of some $300-million.

The seriously under-seen Harry Brown, made on the typical British shoestring budget and featuring 77-year-old Michael Caine having his own Bourne moment (Caine plays a former soldier who reasserts his military training to punish south London scrotes) has made $10-million to date. Again, part of the force of these films comes with their history — you can squint at Harry Brown and almost imagine it as the sequel to Caine’s Get Carter, if Cockney terminator Jack Carter hadn’t died on that beach.

As an aside, it’s worth mentioning that Caine was pushing 40 when he made Get Carter. As was Steve McQueen when he made Bullitt, and even then his face looked like a collection of rocks wrapped in a weathered leather drum skin.

The combined age of the leads in the epic caper movie, The Taking of Pelham One Two Three (1974) is something like 300, the two cop heroes (Walter Matthau and Jerry Stiller) accounting for 101 of those years on their own.

Lee Marvin was already 44 when he made Point Blank, and Marvin came out of the womb with the face of an ancient bar brawler who chewed through the wall of the old people’s home every Saturday night to hunt whisky. These were as young as cinema adventurers got to be in the action movie’s early days — the teenager had only recently been invented, and you didn’t get to be an action hero until you were too old to be seen on TV.

The end of that particular cycle came just a few years after Get Carter and Bullitt, when McQueen was told that in the modern world of the mid-1970s he was too old to play … John Rambo.

There’s a sense that people are discovering that audiences do not, in fact, shed their love of actors and character types with the seasons, and want to continue to journey with them for as long as possible — no matter that they may be from the seamier end of pop culture, or the more obvious and clumping of genres.

For the generations who grew up with these characters, there is no sudden age when we can only cope with period dramas and Woody Allen films. And if you’re the age of the abruptly unretired spies of Red, then Bourne’s Matt Damon looks like a foetus in a coat to you.

Perhaps there really is a new phase in Hollywood — a reminder that not only can our older generations still beat the blood out of us, but also that they’ve got money to spend.

And while you’re playing with the computer games they don’t like or understand, they’re buying seats at the cinema to watch films about you getting kicked in the face by them. —