J Arthur Brown gets R150k fine for Fidentia fraud

Handing down the sentence on Wednesday, Western Cape High Court Judge Anton Veldhuizen said a R75 000 fine applied for each fraud count.

He was also given 18 months in jail for each count, suspended for four years on condition he not be convicted for fraud again.

Brown (43) looked tired as police officers shackled his wrists and led him out of courtroom 19.

Pensioners, businesspeople and other members of the public in the packed courtroom had mixed expressions of disbelief and relief when the sentence was handed down.

Brown was recently convicted after he admitted to misrepresentations he made regarding investments entrusted to him.


The state originally laid 192 charges against him.

Found guilty
Brown was found guilty on two counts of fraud by the Western Cape High Court in April this year. 

The charges are related to dealings with the Transport Education and Training Authority and the Mantadia Asset Trust Company.

Brown was acquitted on seven other charges of corruption, money-laundering, theft and fraud.

His bail of R1-million was extended and he was told to return to court on April 29, for sentencing arguments. 

Admission statement
Brown handed in an admissions document in April in relation to the two fraud charges he was convicted on, but the court had misgivings about the strengths of the admissions. He then handed in an altered admissions document, which the court accepted.

He initially admitted that Fidentia did not have enough liquid cash at the time of purchase, but that it had enough assets in the form of negotiable instruments. He also admitted that Fidentia had misrepresented itself by saying the full purchase price for Matco would be paid before it took control.

The second admission statement handed in included the terms of the purchase agreement and made it clear that the purchaser had to have "immediately available funds".

"Fidentia and I misrepresented that Fidentia was able to do so and thereby induced the shareholders of Matco to enter into the agreement and sell their shares to Fidentia," Brown said in the altered document.

He admitted that Fidentia took control of Matco in October 2004, before full payment was made to all shareholders, contradictory to the terms of the agreement.

Accepting personal responsibility, he said he ordered the transfer of R69-million from the Matco account to Fidentia, which would later be used to pay the remainder of the Matco purchase price.

"The above actions amounted to a misrepresentation of the true facts in respect of the sale of share agreement and the method and time of payment … My actions were unlawful and constituted fraud by way of dolus eventualis [indirect intent]. – Sapa

Subscribe to the M&G

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

Sapa
Guest Author

Related stories

Advertising

Subscribers only

Come what may, the UIF will pay

The fund – the main safety net for unemployed workers – will run at an almost R20-billion deficit

‘Terrorised’ family shines a light on traditional leadership for vulnerable...

The ambiguity between traditional and constitutional leadership has been exposed by the violent banishment of an Eastern Cape family

More top stories

High court grants Dlamini-Zuma leave to appeal adverse ruling on...

The court held that the ongoing state of disaster meant there was public interest in the legal test applied to measures taken to contain the pandemic

Concourt to hear Zondo commission’s application for contempt order against...

The former president has one week to file answering papers in the application that also seeks a prison sentence imposed on him

Koko maintains he had no idea he was exchanging emails...

On his fourth appearance before the commission, the former Eskom CEO maintains he was tricked into sharing company information with a third party

Zuma foundation claims ex-president was prepared to testify, but Zondo...

Zuma’s namesake organisation twists facts and the law – he told Zondo he would answer questions but only in private to the deputy chief justice
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…