Zim elections were a sham, says Fedusa

Fedusa has condemned the elections in Zimbabwe, saying it was not free or fair. (Skyler Reid)

Fedusa has condemned the elections in Zimbabwe, saying it was not free or fair. (Skyler Reid)

According to its observer at the elections there were allegations of vote rigging and general administrative injustice, the Federation of Unions of South Africa (Fedusa) said in a statement on Monday.

"Firstly we must agree that the Zimbabwean elections of 2013 were peaceful and without obvious intimidation, especially in light of what happened in 2008. However, we can categorically state that the electoral processes were not fair."

Fedusa said the voters' roll was only released on Tuesday, on the eve of the election, and many people who wanted to vote did not appear on the list.

Fedusa representative Elias Bila formed part of an observer team deployed by its regional mother body, the Southern African Trade Union Co-ordination Council (SATUCC).

It represents 19 national trade union federations in 13 Southern African Development Community (SADC) countries.

Election observers
​Fedusa said SATUCC deployed 27 observers to six major provinces of Zimbabwe to observe the elections.

"Many voters who did not appear on the voters' roll were allowed to register there and then on a separate register, while others were not," it said.

"Most voting stations did not have basic services like electricity and many had to count ballots during the night by candlelight.This felt almost like we were in the previous century."

More worrying were instances where ballot counting was not done by the Zimbabwean Electoral Commission, but by the Zimbabwean police service, which was politically aligned to the ruling Zanu-PF party.

"There were obvious things like party agents assisting illiterate voters with their voting by basically voting on their behalf, without any questions being asked," Fedusa said.

Many voters were registered to vote at the wrong polling stations, meaning that they had to travel long distances. Fedusa estimated that about one million people could have been affected by these administrative irregularities.

"The fact of the matter is that the Zimbabwean elections were not free and fair," it said.

"We believe from what we saw on the ground that the Movement for Democratic Change had a clear majority of votes at the stations, while it is reported that the Zanu-PF was victorious.
This is simply not true."  – Sapa

Client Media Releases

Changes at MBDA already producing the fruits
University open days: Look beyond banners, balloons to make the best choice
ITWeb, VMware second CISO survey under way
Doctoral study on leveraging the green economy
NWU's LLB degree receives full accreditation