Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

Tennis legends return to US Open limelight

If Boris Becker and Goran Ivanisevic have done their jobs properly, then Monday’s US Open final will be between Novak Djokovic and Marin Cilic.

Becker and Ivanisevic may not be playing tennis anymore but they are having an impact in New York as two of the weekend’s four-strong celebrity coaching brigade.

Becker works with world number one Djokovic, former Wimbledon winner Ivanisevic is in Cilic’s corner, Stefan Edberg is the power behind Roger Federer, while the US Open’s fourth semifinalist, Kei Nishikori, hired 1989 French Open champion Michael Chang.

If their own head-to-head records were duplicated in Saturday’s semifinals, then Djokovic and Cilic would come out on top – Becker enjoyed a record 5-1 wins against Chang while Ivanisevic was 10-9 against Edberg.

But Federer won’t be influenced by such history after Edberg, a back-to-back US Open winner in 1991 and 1992 and a six-time major champion, engineered the Swiss star’s stunning fightback from two match points down in his five-set quarterfinal win over Frenchman Gael Monfils.

Match statistics
The dry statistics revealed Edberg’s influence, with Federer winning 15 of 19 serve-and-volley points and 53 points from 74 net approaches.

“I started to serve and volley some more as the match went on,” said Federer, who takes a 5-0 career lead over Cilic into his semifinal.

“I’m happy I’m spending some time at the net, because that’s going to keep giving me confidence to keep on doing that as we move along in the tournament.”

Federer brought Edberg on board in December as the 17-time major winner, whose last Grand Slam crown came at Wimbledon in 2012, looked for a crucial edge over his younger rivals.

He came close at Wimbledon this year, losing the final in five sets to Djokovic, and now he is back in a US Open semifinal for the first time since 2011, with a first final since 2009 tantalisingly within reach.

“He was very, very close to winning at Wimbledon. I still believe the way he’s playing, and if he can keep working and stay healthy, he’s got a shot of doing very well,” said the low-key Edberg.

Under his tutelage, Federer enjoyed a promising run-up to New York, finishing as runner-up in Toronto before taking the Cincinnati warm-up title.

“In many ways it’s worse sitting in the stands, because you can’t really do anything sometimes. You wish you could. You want him to do well and so it’s a different feeling, but it’s good so far,” said Edberg.

Of all the star coaching appointments, Becker’s was undoubtedly the most surprising when he signed up with Djokovic.

The six-time major winner, including the 1989 US Open, enjoyed a lucrative media career when he agreed to work alongside Marian Vajda, who has handled the Serb since his teenage years.

“He believes in my game,” said Djokovic, who faces Nishikori in his semifinal on Saturday looking to reach the US Open final for a fifth successive year.

Becker said he sees similarities between himself and Djokovic, both equally extrovert on and off the court. 

“I see in Novak a little bit of Boris Becker,” the German told CNN on the eve of the US Open.

“I see him against Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer and he doesn’t always get a fair deal from the crowd. I live with Novak. Whenever he makes a mistake I feel that I make it too.”

Ivanisevic started working with Cilic in November 2013, just as the young Croat was returning to the tour after serving a doping ban.

Together, they reached the quarterfinals of Wimbledon and now a first-time spot in the US Open semifinals.

“The main part that is coming from Goran to me and what I feel in this relationship is big confidence,” said Cilic, who made the last four by knocking out sixth-seeded Czech Tomas Berdych.

“All the things we are working on, they’re working for me on the court. Having him beside me is definitely another plus, big plus to have him in my box.”

Shared history
Chang has been with Nishikori since December and has his own little bit of history at the US Open – in 1987, when he was just 15, he became the youngest man to win a match at the tournament.

Nishikori, the first Japanese man since 1918 to make the semifinals, has a 1-1 record against Djokovic and Chang believes there’s no reason why the 24-year-old can’t take a second win.

“Absolutely. He’s beaten Novak before. There’s no reason why he’s not able to do it again. Come Saturday, I think it’s going to be a great match,” Chang told the New York Post. – AFP

Subscribe to the M&G

Thanks for enjoying the Mail & Guardian, we’re proud of our 36 year history, throughout which we have delivered to readers the most important, unbiased stories in South Africa. Good journalism costs, though, and right from our very first edition we’ve relied on reader subscriptions to protect our independence.

Digital subscribers get access to all of our award-winning journalism, including premium features, as well as exclusive events, newsletters, webinars and the cryptic crossword. Click here to find out how to join them.

Related stories


If you’re reading this, you clearly have great taste

If you haven’t already, you can subscribe to the Mail & Guardian for less than the cost of a cup of coffee a week, and get more great reads.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here


Subscribers only

‘Exciting’ ramp-up for Covid jabs

As more vaccines arrive in the country, South Africa could administer 420 000 doses a day

Mokgoro was party to talks of his resignation

The North West premier has defied the interim provincial committee’s decision

More top stories

‘Exciting’ ramp-up for Covid jabs

As more vaccines arrive in the country, South Africa could administer 420 000 doses a day

Mokgoro was party to talks of his resignation

The North West premier has defied the interim provincial committee’s decision

Richard Calland: Cyril’s wicked cabinet conundrum

Three weeks ago, a second term for the president seemed a safe bet, but the insurgency has thrown the puzzle pieces in the air

ConCourt finds that protection of LGBT+ rights was intrinsic to...

The court also found that the term hurtful should be excised from the Equality Act in that it did not meet the justification threshold in the Constitution and gave Parliament 24 months to do so

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…