Ashwin Willemse won’t be back on SuperSport

SuperSport has confirmed that Ashwin Willemse will not be back on television now that his contract with the company has expired.

It has been over three months since Willemse stunned South Africa on May 19 by walking off a live set during a Super Rugby broadcast, claiming that his colleagues Nick Mallett and Naas Botha had “undermined” and “patronised” him.

What followed was a media storm that resulted in an internal SuperSport inquiry.

Race was at the centre of the nation-wide debate that followed the incident, and as a result all three presenters were taken off air by SuperSport while remaining on full pay.

Mallett, in particular, came in for heavy abuse on social media for an alleged history of speaking down to Willemse.

Mallett and Botha have since returned to the studio, while Willemse and his legal team have remained quiet.

Following the internal inquiry, Willemse said that he would be elevating the matter to the Equality Court, but SuperSport confirmed to media on Thursday that they had not yet heard from the Equality Court.

Instead, they are in communication with the Human Rights Commission, as per the instruction that came from Advocate Vincent Maleka SC’s report after the inquiry.

SuperSport would not open up on whether or not there were negotiations

The in-studio panel for this weekend’s Rugby Championship match between the Springboks and Australia will be Xola Ntshinga, Victor Matfield, Breyton Paulse, Botha and Hanyani Shimange. — Sport24

We make it make sense

If this story helped you navigate your world, subscribe to the M&G today for just R30 for the first three months

Subscribers get access to all our best journalism, subscriber-only newsletters, events and a weekly cryptic crossword.”

Related stories

WELCOME TO YOUR M&G

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

Advertising

Latest stories

War on diamonds: Toil and triumph on the rich barren...

“I’m willing to take a bullet” says Northern Cape natives who claim the land, and its diamonds, belong to them.

Shell v Wild Coast: Science, research and erring on the...

Court applicants have argued that the company should be required to conduct an environmental impact assessment, based on the best available science, which has advanced considerably since Shell’s permit to conduct seismic surveys was granted

How spies shape South Africa’s political path

From Mbeki to Zuma to Ramaphosa, the facts and fictions of the intelligence networks have shadowed political players and settled power struggles

I’m just a lawyer going to court, says attorney on...

The Mthatha attorney is angered by a tweet alleging he sways the high court and the Judicial Services Commission
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…
×