The High Court in Pretoria ruled on September that Jiba and her colleague be struck off the roll of advocates.
His latest assault on Pravin Gordhan appears to be nothing more than a desperate bid to save face.
The finance minister instead invited the NPA boss to withdraw the fraud charges against him.
Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan said on Friday he would not make a presentation to the NPA head.
The National Prosecuting Authority head needs to justify the charges against the finance minister.
The finance minister will not make any presentations to the national director of public prosecutions, according to his legal team.
More leaders in and outside the ANC condemned the decision of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) to charge Gordhan.
What lies behind the decision to criminally charge South Africa’s finance minister?
‘We the leadership of this institution are consulting with senior council on the matter and we are currently considering the matter,’ Abrahams said.
Fraud charges against South African Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan have moved the country a step closer to a junk rating.
‘We trust that today’s announcement will move us a step closer to uncovering the truth from facts and bring this matter to finality,’ the party said.
Shaun Abrahams is briefing the media on the NPA’s investigation into the Sars ‘Rogue Unit’.
A Constitutional Court ruling may result in the president finally facing 783 criminal charges.
NPA spokesperson Luvuyo Mfaku said the court was mindful of the fact that Zuma had petitioned the SCA on the same matter.
NPA spokesperson Luvuyo Mfaku said Jiba and Mrwebi confirmed their instructions to their legal teams to file applications for leave to appeal.
Conviction rates are high, but backlogs are mounting and key crime cases are languishing.
President Jacob Zuma has filed his replying affidavit to the SCA in Bloemfontein, challenging a court ruling that he should face corruption charges.
Oscar Pistorius’s sentence is ‘shockingly lenient’ and ‘disproportionate to the crime of murder’, the National Prosecuting Authority has said.
Readers write in about the NPA, and the SABC.
Inmates want the NPA to tell them why their jailers weren’t prosecuted
The logic behind the head of the prosecuting authority’s decisions to go to court over charges against the president is confusing, if not alarming.
President Jacob Zuma is launching a fightback against his detractors and those threatening his lines of patronage.
There is a strong case to be made that, in the national interest, the NPA must decide whether it intends to prosecute Zuma or not.
Anyone who has followed the actions and inactions of the NPA over the past few years is likely to think that the NPA is pursuing a political agenda.
The Cabinet has asked South Africans to refrain from pressuring the NPA while it evaluated whether to proceed with corruption charges against Zuma.
The public protector will only celebrate the ConCourt ruling affirming her powers when the Hawks and NPA drop their investigation into her conduct.
Rebuilding faith in the NPA is a process that cannot even begin while Zuma is in office.
The former president has accused retired judge Chris Nicholson of putting a "judicial stamp of approval" on allegations against him.
Controversy shrouds the appointment of the Hawks head in Durban, who got the job despite a pending criminal case for allegedly losing his firearm.
The integrity of two appointments, to the Hawks and the prosecuting authority, is questionable.
Decisions by ‘no one’s man’ reveal his vision of an independent national prosecutions authority.
Shaun Abrahams’s flirtation with "information peddlers" and his intervention in the prosecution of Nomgcobo Jiba have raised concerns.