Left near a tree on a nondescript street on the outskirts of Moscow, the fake rock at the centre of the most embarrassing espionage scandal between Britain and Russia since the end of the Cold War looks innocuous enough.
Light brown, 30cm wide, and hollowed out to allow a waterproof box to fit snugly inside, the rock on Monday took on Gibraltar-sized proportions as Russia accused Britain of using it as a covert transmitter to pass messages to agents.
An X-ray of the box, shown on Russian state television, showed four big batteries and a radio transmitter-receiver tightly packed together — a device of such crude simplicity it would have made Q, James Bond’s technical wizard, shudder.
”First the Russian asset would walk past the stone,” Nikolai Zakharov, deputy spokesperson for the Federal Security Service (FSB), as the KGB is now known, said. ”He would send information to the stone from his palmtop, and later the embassy employee would pass by and collect it from another palmtop.”
He said the device, a 21st-century version of the ”dead letter drop”, had a range of up to 20m and could send and receive coded signals to or from small palmtop computers, almost identical to those available on Britain’s high streets. It enabled British diplomats to communicate indirectly with their alleged Russian agents: it meant they never had to be in the same room as them.
Four members of the British embassy staff were identified by the Russians and accused of being part of a spy ring. The four were all still at their posts on Monday night.
Interfax, the Russian news agency, reported that the FSB had fanned out across Moscow to check other potentially suspicious rocks. Sergei Ignatchenko, chief spokesperson for the FSB, told the agency that a second device had been spotted but was retrieved by British agents.
The echoes of Ian Fleming and John le Carré will raise a smile in Britain and elsewhere. But there is serious side to this, and not only for the alleged Russian agent being held in Moscow accused of handling state secrets. Though old Cold War enemies — such as Britain and Russia — have set up procedures to cooperate quite closely on counter-terrorism, they still indulge in a mutual spying game. The second-oldest profession is as alive and as well as the oldest.
The British government still wants to know what nuclear or other military developments the Russians are up to, or Moscow’s real attitude towards Iran, Iraq and how it intends to use its gas resources as a geopolitical weapon. Moscow, meanwhile, is stepping up activities in Britain. MI5 says Russia has as many spies in London now as it did during the Cold War.
Ignatchenko said British intelligence told the Russians in 1994 they would stop spying on the country, but still ”as a rule they send their most talented men”. Once the alleged spy ring was discovered last year, he added, the FSB asked Paul Crompton — described by the British Foreign Office as third secretary (political affairs) at the embassy but by the FSB as the Moscow desk officer for MI6, the British secret service — to desist. Crompton denied the spying allegations and, said Ignatchenko, the agents continued their activities.
The state TV documentary broadcast on Sunday showed Christopher Pirt (30), a secretary archivist in the embassy, walking past the rock, his eyes shifting wildly as he is secretly filmed by FSB counter-intelligence. Crompton was also named as having repeatedly visited the rock, as did Marc Doe (27), the second secretary (political affairs). Andy Fleming (32), another secretary archivist, was filmed picking up the rock after kicking it with his foot. The men were dressed in tracksuits and woolly hats and carried rucksacks.
”We have a gentlemen’s understanding that official intelligence representatives won’t engage in espionage. The agreement seems to have been breached. We have been deceived,” Ignatchenko said. A decision was then taken to expose the unit. Zakharov said no official complaint had been made by the Russian government about the men’s activities. He added that any future reaction would come ”from governmental level”.
Russia holds the Group of Eight chairmanship this year and it will be reluctant to risk this with a full-scale diplomatic rift with Britain. The FSB decision to hand the material over to state TV is primarily a domestic political move, aimed at undermining links between the British government and non-governmental bodies it funds to help promote democracy and human rights.
There is little need for a formal protest by Russia given how this week’s high-profile accusations will make the diplomats’ continued work near-impossible. Moscow may also be keen to avoid tit-for-tat expulsions from its London embassy.
The British Foreign Office on Monday described the allegations as ”surprising”, which is not a denial. Prime Minister Tony Blair, when questioned at his monthly press conference, said he had only heard about it on Teletext and did not comment ”on security matters”.
The recording rock is one of more than half-a-dozen occasions in the past six years in which Britain has been accused of carrying out intelligence operations against countries regarded as friends — or at least no longer enemies. The European Union investigated claims in 2000 that the United States and Britain were eavesdropping on other EU members in Brussels, and — most embarrassing of all — there were claims that Britain bugged United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan’s offices, before the Iraq war in 2003.
Last year, MI6 launched a website seeking new recruits. It said: ”Whether you have the skills to design hi-tech gadgets or deploy them in a hostile environment, SIS [as MI6 is also known] may have the career for you.” The rock farce suggests a new Q is urgently needed. — Guardian Unlimited Â