Sentech crosses signals
They say hindsight has 20/20 vision. In that case, Sentech needs to get its eyes checked. The parastatal announced the details of its plan to spend R1,2-billion of taxpayers’ money building a new national wireless broadband network over the next three years.
With Sentech’s previous failings in the wireless broadband and telecoms sector still looming large, the question has to be asked why government is allowing it to once again diversify from its core responsibilities, namely signal distribution.
The announcement has also prompted a response from the GSM Association (GSMA), a global body that represents most mobile operators worldwide.
GSMA has called the decision to build a rural wireless broadband network using the 2,6GHz spectrum band “really silly” because the spectrum band is best suited to dense urban areas and has called for the parastatal to focus on the digital to terrestrial migration process.
It was just more than a year ago that the Mail & Guardian reported that Sentech was a “basket case” facing huge financial losses and a leadership crisis. A task team had been appointed at the time by former communications minister Siphiwe Nyanda to draw up a turnaround strategy for the troubled parastatal. It emphasised the fact that Sentech’s “thorny” financial position had been caused by its unprofitable telecoms products, which were non-core revenue streams.
In 2007 the Sentech board took the decision to discontinue all nonperforming telecoms products after a request from government. These included Sentech’s MyWireless, Biznet and VAS services. Sentech’s 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 annual reports showed that since the decision was taken these services had cost it R385-million while bringing in only R39-million in revenue. They were terminated in 2010, giving the new Sentech management the time to focus on improving the parastatal’s solvency.
Numerous industry players who spoke to the M&G at the time said that Sentech had a massive opportunity to become a major player in the wireless broadband market between 2002 and 2003, but it had “missed the boat”.
“It’s too late to claw back into that market now,” said an analyst. “In 2002-2003, it had a great opportunity to enter the wireless broadband market and it let it slip between its fingers.” The task team maintained that Sentech’s degeneration into its loss-making situation began with the awarding of telecoms licences and the organisation’s attempts to launch its telecoms services without adequate funding, robust business plans and well-thought-out strategies.
Let’s hope that this is not the case once again. To be fair, Sentech’s new chief executive, Setumi Mohapi, and chairperson, Logan Naidoo, talked a good talk this week when outlining its corporate plan for the medium term. If they are to be believed, Sentech has learned from its previous failings in the wireless broadband market and is not seeking to compete against private players.
Its strategy is to roll out a wireless broadband network in rural areas at government’s expense to service primarily rural schools and then to recoup only the operational costs not the capital casts of rolling out the network. Rollout is expected to begin in the third quarter of this year and will be completed by March 2014. A total of 27 578 schools have been identified as beneficiaries of the network, with 60% of these in KwaZulu-Natal, the Eastern Cape and Limpopo.
It appears that the wireless broadband strategy is being driven by Communications Minister Roy Padayachie, which is hardly a surprise considering that he served as a deputy minister under former communications minister Ivy Matsepe-Casaburri, whose dismal reign also included plans for Sentech to roll out a national wireless broadband network in the rural areas. Matsepe-Casaburri’s policy focused on the rollout of e-government in the rural areas and Naidoo stressed these benefits again this week. However Matsepe-Casaburri’s initial plans failed to come to fruition because national treasury didn’t approve the parastatal’s business plans for the wireless network after it had requested R3,8-billion.
“Thank god for treasury,” said one industry insider at the time, when questioned about Sentech’s failure to get its business plans approved. So, what has changed?
Why are national treasury and the communications department giving this parastatal the opportunity potentially to waste more taxpayers’ money? Surely by now Sentech has learned its lesson about playing in non-core markets?
Mohapi moved to assure South Africans that Sentech would not repeat the “mistakes of the past” and that he was confident that it was feasible for Sentech to recover the operational costs of the network. “This is a new phase for Sentech,” said Naidoo at this week’s briefing. Let’s hope we don’t have another billion-rand mistake on our hands.