Zille responds to Twitter furore

Democratic Alliance leader Helen Zille has acknowledged that the social platform Twitter can be as troublesome for a politician as it it useful, following a public spat with Simphiwe Dana.

Twitter can be the perfect platform for public engagement if used correctly, but it is also the ideal place to provoke and underpin prejudice, wrote the Western Cape premier in her newsletter on Tuesday.

Following on a public squabble on Twitter with several high-profile users last week, Zille admitted that those who tweeted left themselves open to criticism that they could not adequately respond to using the 140 character limit.

In the spat, Dana accused Zille and the DA of being blatantly racist in their governance of the Western Cape, doing nothing to tackle poverty and inequality.

The songstress also challenged the premier’s assertions that Cape Town is the best-run city in South Africa and that the Western Cape enjoys the lowest rate of unemployment in the country.

Zille fired back several of her own tweets, arguing that her party was non-racial and has implemented policies that fight poverty.

Zille conceded in her newsletter that she may have acted hastily in her response: “I worked hard at resisting the temptation to respond [but] I took the bait and replied.”

Quality versus quantity
While pointing to the benefits of using the microblogging site, Zille argued that it was near impossible to sufficiently address questions posed to politicians on Twitter.

“It is possible to ask a complex question in 140 characters, but usually impossible to answer it adequately. Inadequate responses generate many complex misinterpretations (often deliberate) that multiply stratospherically through cyberspace,” she wrote.

The opposition leader contends that Twitter has thus become the ideal space for those wanting to incite anger and bigotry.

“This makes Twitter the perfect medium for provoking and spreading moral outrage, reinforcing prejudices, and driving personal agendas,” she wrote.

Dana did not comment when approached by the Mail & Guardian, saying she would respond in due course through an article of her own.

Slippery political slope
Political analyst Professor Adam Habib concurred with Zille’s statements, arguing that social networks such as Twitter could easily be used for nefarious purposes, and questioning the overall benefits of using the medium to interact with followers.

“The more mechanisms you use the better, although it’s only a relatively privileged section of the population you are targeting [with Twitter],” he said.

Habib also urged politicians who use blogs and other social networks as a means of communication to treat them like any other public interaction.

“The correct processes should be followed to ensure that proper engagement occurs,” he said.

Nickolaus Bauer

Nickolaus Bauer

Nickolaus Bauer is the Mail & Guardian's jack of all trades news reporter that chases down stories ranging from politics and sports to big business and social justice. Armed with an iPad, SLR camera, camcorder and dictaphone, he aims to fight ignorance and pessimism through written words, photographs and videos. He believes South Africa could be the greatest country in the world if only her citizens would give her a chance to flourish instead of dwell on the negativity. When he's not begging his sub-editors for an extra twenty minutes after deadline, he's also known to dabble in the occasional poignant column that will leave you mulling around in the depths of your psyche. The quintessential workaholic, you can also catch him doing sports on the weekday breakfast show on SAfm and presenting the SAfm Sports Special over the weekend. Read more from Nickolaus Bauer

Client Media Releases

Five ways to use Mobi-gram
Leopards Lair 2019: winner fights period poverty
MTN gears up for Black Friday sale promotion
Software licensing should be getting simpler, but it's not
Utility outages: looking at the big picture