Lindy Chamberlain-Creighton speaks to the media as her ex-husband
A day after Azaria Chamberlain would have turned 32, a coroner found that a dingo had taken her as a nine-week-old baby from a tent near Ayers Rock, the red monolith in the Australian desert now known by its Aboriginal name Uluru. That is what her parents had maintained from the beginning.
The eyes of Lindy Chamberlain-Creighton and her ex-husband, Michael Chamberlain, welled with tears as the findings of the fourth inquest into their daughter’s disappearance were broadcast from a courtroom in the north city of Darwin to TVs around Australia.
The first inquest in 1981 had also blamed a dingo. But a second inquest a year later charged Chamberlain-Creighton with murder and her husband with being an accessory after the fact. She was convicted and served more than three years in prison before that decision was overturned.
A third inquest in 1995 left the cause of death open.
The case became famous internationally through the 1988 Meryl Streep movie A Cry in the Dark.
Other attacks
Many Australians initially did not believe that a dingo was strong enough to take away the baby. Public opinion swayed harshly against the couple; some even spat on Chamberlain-Creighton and howled like dingoes outside her house.
No similar dingo attack had been documented at the time, but in recent years the wild dogs have been blamed for three fatal attacks on children. Some still doubted the couple’s story today, but the latest inquest – which the family had fought to get – made it official that Azaria was killed in a dingo attack.
The news was welcomed by many around the country.
Yvonne Cain, one of the 12 jurors in the 1982 trial that convicted a then-pregnant Lindy Chamberlain of murder, was thrilled that a dingo is now on the record as the culprit.
“The dingo has done it. I’m absolutely thrilled to bits,” Cain said. “I’d always had my doubts and have become certain she’s innocent.”
Cain said while she still encountered people who doubt the Chamberlains’ innocence, but they inevitably misunderstand what evidence there was against them.
“When people say she’s guilty, I say: ‘You have no idea what they’re talking about – I was there,'” she said.
Unsurprising behaviour
An expert on dingo behaviour, Brad Purcell said he was not surprised that a dingo would enter a tent and take a baby while older siblings slept.
Purcell suspects that many people blamed Chamberlain-Creighton for leaving the baby in a tent where a dingo could have been attracted by her crying.
“She was almost being condemned because she wasn’t acting as a responsible parent,” Purcell told Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
But not all Australians accept the latest ruling.
A police officer who was at Uluru the night Azaria disappeared said he still believes the first coroner’s finding that there was some human intervention.
Frank Morris, who has since retired from the police force, said while he was not trying to blame the parents, he thought someone played a part in moving clothing Azaria wore that night.
“We don’t know who. That is the $64 000 question,” Morris said.
“If you go to court enough times, you are bound to get a win sooner or later,” Morris added of the parents’ victory on Tuesday.
‘Relieved and delighted’
Azaria’s parents and her three siblings, including 29-year-old sister Kahlia who was born in prison, on Tuesday collected her new death certificate.
“We’re relieved and delighted to come to the end of this saga,” a tearful but smiling Chamberlain-Creighton told reporters outside the court.
Coroner Elizabeth Morris said she was “satisfied that the evidence is sufficiently adequate, clear, cogent and exact and that the evidence excludes all other reasonable possibilities”.
The findings mirror those of the first coroner’s inquest in 1981. But that inquest found that somebody had later interfered with Azaria’s clothing, which was later found relatively unscathed in the desert.
A second coroner’s inquest triggered a Northern Territory Supreme Court trial that resulted in Chamberlain-Creighton being found guilty of slashing her daughter’s throat and making it look like a dingo attack.
She was convicted in 1982 and sentenced to life in prison with hard labour.
Further inquests
She was released in 1986 after evidence was found that backed up her version of events: the baby’s jacket, found near a dingo den, which helped explain the condition of the rest of the baby’s clothing. A Royal Commission, the highest form of investigation in Australia, debunked much of the forensic evidence used at her trial and her conviction was overturned.
A third inquest could not determine the cause of death.
The fourth inquest heard new evidence of dingo attacks, including three fatal attacks on children since the third inquest.
Morris noted that dingo experts disagreed on whether a dingo could have removed the clothing so neatly and without causing more damage.
“It would have been very difficult for a dingo to have removed Azaria from her clothing without causing more damage than what was observed on it, however it would have been possible for it to have done so,” she said.
Michael Chamberlain threatened to go the Northern Territory Supreme Court to force another inquest if Morris had not agreed to reopen the case. Another coroner rejected his application in 2004 for a fourth inquest to challenge the 1995 finding.
“This has been a terrifying battle, bitter at times, but now some healing and a chance to put our daughter’s spirit to rest,” Chamberlain told reporters.
He said his quest for a death certificate that acknowledged his daughter had been killed by a dingo had seemed to be a “mission impossible”.
“This battle to get to the legal truth about what caused Azaria’s death has taken too long,” Chamberlain said.
“However, I am here to tell you that you can get justice even when you think that all is lost. But truth must be on your side.” – Sapa-AP