Stokvel ‘lost millions’ to Mrs John Block

The wife of controversial politician John Block ran a "fraudulent" investment scheme that made off with nearly R5-million belonging to members of a Gauteng stokvel, papers filed in the Northern Cape High Court have alleged.

Noluthando Block is opposing the stokvel's application, saying its allegations against her are "defamatory, vexatious, scandalous or irrelevant and should be ignored, and I reserve my rights in full".

She is the sole director of Queenswood Trading, an entity in which the Thuthukani Stokvel invested millions during 2011. Thuthukani has launched an application to have Queenswood's assets wound up and placed under the custodianship of the court until a provisional liquidator is appointed.

The stokvel has 1732 members, who allege that they have lost their savings through Block's scheme.

The Diamond Fields Advertiser reported in 2012 that another Queenswood investor had also complained of losing millions through the scheme.

Leaked bank details show that two payments of more than R2-million each were invested with Queenswood and subsequently reinvested with a company called Macro Trade. The investor claimed not to have agreed to this.

Email correspondence between Thuthukani and Queenswood shows that when the stokvel inquired about the status of the investment, it was directed to Macro Trade's website. The website no longer operates and the company is not registered in South Africa.

Capital investments
According to court papers filed last year, the stokvel's members aimed to use their return on investments for various expenses including funerals, education and entertainment. The agreement between Block and the stokvel stipulated that Thuthukani would invest money with Queenswood each month. In return, it would receive monthly interest of 30% if the total amount invested was less than R2-million and 35% if it exceeded that amount.

The interest was to be paid into Thuthukani's bank account on the 15th of each month. After the first six months, Queenswood was supposed to refund Thuthukani's capital investments in monthly instalments.

Thuthukani representative Walter Ndinisa alleges that between January 26 2011 and May 25 2011, the stokvel made investments with Queenswood totalling R4.2million. This is confirmed by bank statements.

During May 2011, Ndinisa contacted Block to complain that the interest payments were erratic – sometimes more than had been agreed to, and sometimes less. Thuthukani alleges that Block then agreed on a new payment plan, whereby R750 000 would be paid on the 15th of each month and R595 000 on the 30th from July 2011.

During July and August 2011, Block paid about R2.6-million into Thuthukani's bank account. But by September, the payouts had allegedly fallen by more than half, with Queenswood making two payments of R300 000 each that month.

The following month, the stok-vel's lawyers wrote to Queenswood, threatening civil action and demanding to see its Financial Services Board (FSB) registration number. Queenswood denied any liability.

Sufficient proof
Thuthukani alleges that, to date, Queenswood has failed or refused to pay out the entire R4.2-million in capital and R2.7-million in interest.

This is "sufficient proof" that Queenswood is unable to pay its debts, according to Thuthukani's liquidation application.

The FSB has confirmed to the Mail & Guardian that Queenswood is not listed on its database as a registered financial services provider.

In court papers, Ndinisa says that Block's failure to comply with the relevant legislation indicates that she "conducts her business recklessly and/or fraudulently, with gross negligence or with the intent to defraud … or for fraudulent purposes … I am advised that [Block] should be criminally liable for fraudulent activities relating to Queenswood Trading."

In her responding affidavit, Block says Thuthukani was not her client and that she dealt with Ndinisa on the understanding that he was investing his own money. She denied owing him anything.

Block later reported Thuthukani to the South African Revenue Service, claiming it is not properly registered.

"The applicant [Thuthukani] is unknown to the respondents [Queenswood and Block] and accordingly does not exist," she claims.

She did not respond to questions from the M&G.

Subscribe to the M&G

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

Sarah Evans
Sarah Evans

Sarah Evans interned at the Diamond Fields Advertiser in Kimberley for three years before completing an internship at the Mail & Guardian Centre for Investigative Journalism (amaBhungane). She went on to work as a Mail & Guardian news reporter with areas of interest including crime, law, governance and the nexus between business and politics. 

Related stories


Subscribers only

Poachers in prisons tell their stories

Interviews with offenders provide insight into the structure of illegal wildlife trade networks

Covid-overflow hospital in ruins as SIU investigates

A high-level probe has begun into hundreds of millions of rand spent by the Gauteng health department to refurbish a hospital that is now seven months behind schedule – and lying empty

More top stories

The politics of the Zuma-Zondo showdown

Any move made by the Zondo commission head or by former president Jacob Zuma must be calculated, because one mistake from either side could lead to a political fallout

Museveni declared winner of disputed Uganda election

Security personnel out in force as longtime president wins sixth term and main challenger Bobi Wine alleges rigging.

Pay-TV inquiry probes the Multichoice monopoly

Africa’s largest subscription television operator says it is under threat amid the emerging popularity of global platforms like Netflix and Amazon Prime

‘No one took us seriously’: Black cops warned about racist...

Allegations of racism against the Capitol Police are nothing new: Over 250 Black cops have sued the department since 2001. Some of those former officers now say it’s no surprise white nationalists were able to storm the building

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…