Dina Pule's furious letter to SABC board

The SABC board’s deputy chairperson Thami ka Plaatjie and chairperson Ben Ngubane are waiting to hear whether President Jacob Zuma will accept their resignations. (David Harrison, M&G)

The SABC board’s deputy chairperson Thami ka Plaatjie and chairperson Ben Ngubane are waiting to hear whether President Jacob Zuma will accept their resignations. (David Harrison, M&G)

Communications Minister Dina Pule has lashed out in a scathing letter at the SABC board for the suspension of the corporation’s controversial chief financial officer Gugu Duda, the appointment of her replacement and the reinstatement of acting chief operating officer Hlaudi Motsoeneng, which she described as “unprocedural”.

Duda, a chartered accountant who was on a five-year contract at the SABC until she was suspended by the board, is being investigated for allegations of financial irregularities and has been suspended on full pay.

Pule expressed her unhappiness in the letter addressed to SABC board chairperson Ben Ngubane. The letter was sent after the unexpected resignation of both Ngubane and his deputy Thami ka Plaatjie earlier this month. The board is in limbo as it waits for President Jacob Zuma, who appointed them to their posts, to consider whether he would accept their resignations.

Amid the mayhem that was provoked by the board’s recent decision to remove Motsoeneng from his post, the minister’s letter has infuriated some board members.
But Motsoeneng, the man at the centre of the imbroglio, never budged from his office and has remained in his post.

Duda was considered to be the minister’s choice as chief financial officer by some board members, because Pule had rejected others on the short list until Duda’s name was added.

A board member who did not want to be identified said that it was “outrageous” that Pule appeared to be trying to protect Duda. Pule has the final say in the appointment of SABC executive directors recommended by the board, but she is not expected to interfere with disciplinary processes or suspensions at the public broadcaster, a board member told the Mail & Guardian. Only if a recommendation is made for an executive director to be fired will the board members ask the communications minister to approve the action.

Pule’s spokesperson Siya Qoza said he had heard the minister’s letter had been misinterpreted, which he considered “mischievous”.

“The minister was concerned about the inconsistencies she was seeing and merely pointed them out,” he said. “Decisions about the executives of the SABC are made by the SABC board and not the minister.”

The M&G has a copy of the letter, dated March 6, in which Pule explained she was concerned about the “inconsistencies” she was experiencing from the board.

In her correspondence, Pule outlined the bizarre turn of events that rocked the SABC board in the past two weeks and explained why she could not accede to two requests from the board.

The first request was a letter signed by Ka Plaatjie. It outlined to Pule the “resolution taken by the board in respect of the current acting chief operating officer”.

The letter to her had indicated that at the special SABC board meeting, the board resolved that Motsoeneng will return to his position as general executive of provinces, with immediate effect. It also indicated that Mike Siluma would be appointed acting chief operations officer with immediate effect.

The second request was again a letter signed by Ka Plaatjie, this time indicating the withdrawal of the decision to remove Motsoeneng from his post, she wrote.

“In November 2011, you requested me to authorise his [Motsoeneng’s] delegation of duties which I did, therefore I appreciate the fact that it is not a statutory requirement, but the board informed me as the shareholder of both these decisions,” wrote Pule. “However, my concern is the inconsistencies I am experiencing from the board.

“Similarly in 2012, the chief financial officer of the SABC was suspended and an acting chief financial officer was appointed. In this case, I was not informed of both decisions. In order to ensure consistency, fairness and proper procedures are followed, I view the above mentioned appointments, suspensions, as well as reinstatements as unprocedural.”

Two separate matters
But a board member said the suspension of Duda and the removal of Motsoeneng from his acting post were two separate matters.

“The two issues of Motsoeneng and Duda are quite different,” said a board member. “The chief financial officer was suspended pending an investigation into alleged financial irregularities, which is something quite different from the situation with Motsoeneng.”

Last year, the SABC announced that its board had suspended Duda. “The action is in connection with external and internal reports that suggest wrongdoing on her part,” the SABC reported. “The board has requested a full investigation of the alleged irregularities, the results of which will be reported to Parliament and the public.”

At the time of Duda’s suspension, board member Lumko Mtimbe told the SABC the board’s decision was a precautionary measure.

“It arises following receipt of reports from forensic people, which led to the suspension of the head of procurement and, unfortunately, in terms of that report, there are conclusions that implicate the chief financial officer,” said Mtimbe.

Pule has previously come under fire over claims that her boyfriend received a multimillion-rand pay cheque in management fees for an information and communication technology indaba in Cape Town.

The public protector, Thuli Madonsela, is investigating whether the minister’s department had pressured the organisers of the conference in June last year to hire Phosane Mngqibisa. Pule has told those around her that the investigation will exonerate her.

Motsoeneng, meanwhile, has remained in his office. An SABC staff member told the M&G that Motsoeneng also received a letter from Ka Plaatjie telling him he could remain in the acting post, only days after he was removed.

A board member said that Motsoeneng should not be in the position and that some members welcomed the resignations by Ngubane and Ka Plaatjie. “There are no political factions in the board. Ngubane and Ka Plaatjie just want to disable the board, but it won’t happen. The rest of us are all in agreement that Hlaudi should be removed as chief operating officer.”

Glynnis Underhill

Glynnis Underhill

Glynnis Underhill has been in journalism for more years than she cares to remember. She loves a good story as much now as she did when she first started. The only difference is today she hopes she is giving something back to the country. Read more from Glynnis Underhill

Client Media Releases

Durban team reaches Enactus World Cup semi-finals
IIE Rosebank College opens campus in Cape Town
Pharmacen makes strides in 3D research for a better life for all
UKZN neurosurgeon on a mission to treat movement disorders
Teraco achieves global top 3 data centre ranking
ContinuitySA's Willem Olivier scoops BCI award
MBDA to host first Eastern Cape Fashion and Design Council
Sanral puts out N2/N3 tenders worth billions
EPBCS lives up to expectations
The benefit of unpacking your payslip
South Africans weigh in on attitudes towards women