Hope fades over CAR peace deal

Civil war: Fighting between different militias has hit citizens in the Central African Republic hard. This soldier is with the Central African Armed Forces in the east of the country. (Florent Vergnes/AFP)

Civil war: Fighting between different militias has hit citizens in the Central African Republic hard. This soldier is with the Central African Armed Forces in the east of the country. (Florent Vergnes/AFP)

There is no doubt a peace deal could be transformative for the Central African Republic. Armed groups control 80% of the territory. Tens of thousands of people languish in internal displacement camps in the centre of the country.
About 1.2-million people are refugees or internally displaced.

READ MORE: Just one month in, optimism around CAR’s peace deal is fading

So there was cautious optimism last month when the parties agreed on a new deal — the eighth since 2012 — in Khartoum under African Union auspices. But there are worrying signs that the peace deal is beginning to fray. Just this week reports surfaced of fighting in Basse Kotto province between Seleka from the Union for Peace in the Central African Republic, on the one side, and anti-balaka on the other.

When the mostly Muslim Seleka made their way toward Bangui in late 2012, they unleashed a new and brutal wave of violence against civilians. In late 2013, the Christian and animist anti-balaka militias began to organise counterattacks. But in those attacks, civilians also became the target

Both sides executed civilians, raped women and girls, pillaged homes, and destroyed villages and neighbourhoods.

I’ve travelled across the country, interviewing victims and their families, and meeting the leaders of many of the armed groups as they fractured, made alliances with former enemies, and tried to remake themselves as political parties.

There was one constant refrain in all the conversations: “This isn’t our fault, so we should not be held accountable for what happened. If civilians suffered, then we should talk about reconciliation, not justice. Justice will only lead to more problems.” This question of justice was crucial in Khartoum. A key sticking point was the question of amnesty. During the talks, one rebel spokesman told journalists plainly: “We must have amnesty to have peace.”

The accord was signed days before the draft was made public, fuelling speculation that the government had offered broad amnesty or that prosecutions were to be frozen. In the end, the agreement was vague on the next steps to ensure justice for human rights abuses, crimes against humanity and war crimes. Representatives of some armed groups consider the establishment of a truth, justice, reconciliation and reparation commission an alternative to criminal accountability.

But they are ignoring that the accord clearly recognises the role impunity has played in entrenching “cycles of violence”. This important point echoes the conclusions of the Bangui Forum national consultations held from May 4 to 11 in 2015 that brought together more than 800 representatives of civilian and nongovernmental organisations, political parties and armed groups. The forum stated that “no amnesty” would be tolerated for those responsible for and acting as accomplices in international crimes.

The establishment of a truth commission does not prevent national and international judicial systems from doing their work. And much has already been accomplished.

Among the recent efforts has been the establishment of a new tribunal in the Central African Republic’s domestic court system to try war crimes and crimes against humanity. The special criminal court began operations late last year. The international criminal court (ICC) has also opened an investigation into crimes committed since 2012. Late last year, the court arrested two leaders of the anti-balaka militias that were parties to the conflict, Alfred Yékatom and Patrice Edouard Ngaissona. The national judicial system continues to prosecute Seleka and anti-balaka leaders and fighters in criminal trials.

Peace dividends that can be gained from the deal are needed. But so are fair and credible prosecutions of crimes to ensure that rampant abuses in the Central African Republic are brought to an end.

The government and its international partners should make clear to the armed groups and to civilians that a truth commission does not equal amnesty. They can do this by providing support for the national judiciary, the special criminal court, and the ICC’s investigation and prosecution of grave crimes.

Lewis Mudge is the Central Africa director at Human Rights Watch

Lewis Mudge

Lewis Mudge

Lewis Mudge is Central Africa Director at Human Rights Watch, focusing on Burundi, the Central African Republic, Cameroon, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Rwanda. Before joining Human Rights Watch he was based in Goma, eastern Congo, as the field manager for Interactive Radio for Justice, an organisation dedicated to creating local radio programs that concentrated on International Criminal Court proceedings. He has lived in Africa for over 13 years, the last 9 of which have been focused on Central Africa. He has written several Human Rights Watch reports and his op-eds have appeared in major papers and news outlets, but his true love is field research and getting to understand the individual cost of human rights abuses. He has a Masters in International Politics from the University of London’s School of Oriental and African Studies. Read more from Lewis Mudge

Client Media Releases

Don't judge a stock by share price alone
UKZN School of Engineering celebrates accreditation from ECSA
MTN celebrates 25 years of enhancing lives through superior network connectivity