Political interference mounts over SABC retrenchments

The SABC is facing political pressure to suspend its planned retrenchments of about 600 employees, despite the public broadcaster facing a bleak future with R1.2-billion projected loss for the 2020-21 financial year. The public broadcaster was this week expected to brief the portfolio committee on communications about its turnaround plan, staff optimisation, editorial policy and skills audit. 

But that presentation did not see the light of day on Tuesday or Wednesday, as the board and the executives were not given an opportunity to go ahead with it by the ANC benches. 

“The SABC board and management were scheduled to appear before the parliament’s portfolio committee on communications on Tuesday … In this meeting, the committee resolved that the SABC will come at a later stage to present. We are awaiting further communication on this matter,” said acting SABC spokesperson Mmoni Seapolelo.

Portfolio committee chairperson Boyce Maneli told the Mail & Guardian that there was a unanimous decision this week that SABC’s decision to retrench was premature and that more consultations should take place. 

“In this meeting, it became clear to the committee, during opening remarks by the deputy minister, that the SABC [had not done] what was expected of it, and was not in possession of all the answers that were required,” Maneli said. “The committee resolved that SABC management should go back and hold proper consultations before presenting on the subject matter. Most importantly, the SABC will be invited to respond to all the issues that were raised by the deputy minister, CWU [ Communication Workers Union], Bemawu [Broadcasting, Electronic, Media and Allied Workers Union] and the editorial forum.” 


Maneli said the committee resolved that the public broadcaster should: “conduct [an] open and transparent skills audit, as well as reskill and upskill its workforce … Furthermore, the ANC’s position, which is consistent with that of government, is that of saving existing jobs in all sectors of the economy and creating more new jobs in line with the National Development Plan.” 

This follows an alleged verbal instruction on July 17 by Deputy Communications Minister Pinky Kekana to SABC board chairperson Bongumusa Makhathini, that the public broadcaster should suspend its section 189 process and rescind the board’s resolution on the implementation of its target operating model and the R700-million reduction in employee compensation and headcount. 

“We were stopped from presenting this week. This is a political issue and this is a repeat of what happened in 2018. Remember, the SABC was instructed by [Minister of Communications] Stella [Ndabeni-Abrahams] to stop the process, then last week the same thing happened but that came through the deputy,” said one SABC insider.

The M&G understands that the SABC board has written to Kekana, requesting that her instructions should be written down to comply with the law, and to allow the board to deliberate on them. 

The court had previously found that the board has exclusive powers to control the affairs of the SABC and that the shareholder (the minister of communications) was precluded from exercising any powers to instruct or control the public broadcasters’ directors in how they run the corporation. 

Kekana, through her spokesperson, Zandile Ngubeni, denied instructing the SABC to stop the retrenchment process. “The DM [deputy Mminister] cannot instruct the SABC, so it was not an instruction … As she represents government as a shareholder, she stated on record that, based on the unions not having been consulted, and the skills-audit process not being a transparent process, she does not support the retrenchment process, Kekana said. 

“From her [the deputy minister’s] perspective, this is what she thinks needs to happen until all compliance and governance of section 189 are met, including but not limited to the consultation with the unions, a skills audit that is transparent, et cetera. Also, there seems to be manipulation of certain processes, so there needs to be transparency at all times by the SABC in [its] approach to the processes,” said Kekana.

The M&G understands that the board has told Kekana that it can’t run a parallel process to that of the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA).  

Last week the SABC and the unions met the CCMA about the public broadcaster’s section 189 process. The M&G reported last week that battle lines had been drawn between the SABC and the unions, which vowed to picket over the retrenchment process.  

The unions threatened to approach the labour court for an interdict if the CCMA process continued without their concerns about the skills audit, consultation and alleged unilateral restructuring being addressed.

The SABC, however, has rubbished claims by the unions that there were no consultations, that the skills audit process was not transparent. 

The public broadcaster has had serious cash flow and revenue challenges for several years, and has relied on government bailouts. Last year, the government extended a bailout of R2.1-billion, as part of a R3.2-billion total bailout. 

The SABC told the M&G last week that it has to cut costs because of its dire financial situation, with its salary bill accounting for more than 45% of its expenditure. In its prepared presentations, seen by the M&G, the SABC has also revealed that it spends only 21% on content. 

As a benchmarking exercise, it showed that eMedia Holdings, which has more than 20 channels and fewer than 1 000 employees, spent 11% on staff costs. MultiChoice, with more than 30 channels, spends 15% on employees and 43% on content, even though its model is built on advertising revenue. 

“Look at the BBC: they get about R80 billion a year from the government via TV licenses and then the SABC is expected to carry out its public mandate, but it is not supported,” an SABC insider said. “[The] reasons for any company to retrench is economic and structural — [a]  skills audit has never been part of that. We have been consulting with all the stakeholders.”

It was reported by City Press that the SABC was told by the ANC during a meeting at the party’s headquarters to stop with the retrenchment process. 

Subscribe to the M&G

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

Thanduxolo Jika
Thanduxolo Jika

Thanduxolo Jika is an investigative Journalist and Co-Author of We are going to kill each other today:The Marikana Story. The Messiah of Abantu.

Related stories

SABC staff ready to join picket line

The national broadcaster has rejected claims that it did not follow correct retrenchment and audit processes

Reinstated Ingonyama Trust managers hit with retrenchment notices

The effect of Covid-19 and the land reform department’s freeze of R23-million because the ITB didn’t comply with budget submissions are cited as some of the reasons for the staff cuts

Unemployment fund, CCMA face jobs bloodbath

State bodies shielding workers have been weakened by budget cuts and high demands

Possible lockdown retrenchments are already soaring

After just three months of lockdown, more than 100 000 workers could lose their jobs

Workers rights rolled back as Covid-19 strikes

The economic crisis triggered by the pandemic has laid bare longstanding deficiencies in labour rights around the world

SABC plans to retrench 600 employees

Broadcaster cites “poor sales effectiveness, ineffective commercial product, old pricing models and inadequate technology infrastructure” as driving cuts
Advertising

Ingonyama Trust Board moves to retrench staff

More than 50 workers at the Ingonyama Trust Board have been issued section 189 notices

No proof of Covid-19 reinfection, yet

Some people report testing positive for Covid-19 after initially having the disease and then testing negative. Scientists are still trying to understand if this means that reinfection is possible
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…

The best local and international journalism

handpicked and in your inbox every weekday