MATTHEW BURBIDGE, Johannesburg | Thursday
AS the big guns gather in Pretoria to probe alleged corruption in South Africas controversial arms acquisition deal, a small group of people on Thursday huddled in front of a run-down hospital in Johannesburg to protest military spending.
Asked how a small group could ever hope to influence the governments policy, one demonstrator said: even a small voice is better than no voice, and others added that the protest was a small start to a big movement.
Sloganeering aside, the Coalition Against Military Spending said they had chosen to protest outside the somewhat tatty Coronation Hospital because it illustrated the $5.5-billion earmarked for arms could have been better spent, to name but two examples, on health care and houses.
The coalitions representative, Rob Thomson proposed that the South African air force and navy be mothballed and that the defence force be disbanded.
We dont need a defence force and should rather move to civilian based defence, which involves peoples resistance to submission to authoritarian rule. We should be defending social spending, not our territory or our borders, he said.
South Africas security is not threatened by military enemies. The things that threaten us are Aids, poverty and global capitalism.
Mark Malan, the head of the peace missions programme at SAs Institute for Security Studies said while he understood the coalitions outrage at the massive spending, we live in a dangerous neighborhood.
I grant them (the coalition) that there are pressing socioeconomic problems – how do you relate submarines to the minimum levels of stability required in society for development?
Malan said the short answer to whether South Africa needed all the arms it had ordered was no – or at least not right now.
Its rather the cost of not doing it (buying arms) – or whether we will need them in three of five years time – the answer then – conceivably yes.
Malan said to do away with SAs armed forced, while Lesotho, Swaziland, Angola and Mozambique kept theirs, would be to invite trouble.
He said at the time of the defence review, in 1998, the thinking seemed to have been informed by post cold war euphoria, but with hindsight, it now appeared as if the southern African region is far from peaceful.
It would be inconceivable to disband our armed forces. We are looking to play a leadership role in conflict resolution and whether we like it or not, this does involve the deployment of troops. There is a close nexus between security and development – you cannot have development without a minimum level of security, which would ensure, for instance, freedom of movement.
Malan said while the arms package had seemed affordable at the time, nobody had foreseen the rands plunge – as well as the increasing instability in the southern African region. South Africa is not an island – our stability is linked to that of the region – if we sink the region sinks with us. – Daily Mail & Guardian
ZA*NOW:
SA defence not equipped for arms purchases June 12, 2001
Arms hearings get off the ground – at last June 11, 2001
Public probe into arms deal May 28, 2001
‘Public inquiry may screw up arms probe’ May 27, 2001
Concerns raised over arms probe May 25, 2001
NGO: arms controversy compromising democracy May 16, 2001
Armscor chief ladles on the gravy April 21, 2001
Skeletons rattling in arms closet April 17, 2001
ANC draws veil over Yengeni affair April 14, 2001
So who else got a new Merc? April 9, 2001
German engineering … where you need it most April 8, 2001
New evidence of arms skulduggery April 2, 2001
Tony comes out swinging April 1, 2001
Govt asks media for ‘a bit of space’ April 6, 2001
FEATURES:
Arms deal kingpin helped Jacob Zuma out of money crisis April 2, 2001
Benz man won arms bid March 30, 2001
Yengeni has little to fear from the law March 30, 2001
13