/ 16 May 2002

The great betrayal

President Thabo Mbeki emerged from his talks with the Nordic leaders on the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (Nepad) this week almost rubbing his hands with glee. Mbeki’s overwhelming relief at the positive response of European powers is linked to the impending meeting of the G8, whose stance will be crucial to Nepad. We seriously doubt ordinary Zimbabweans share his enthusiasm.

Mbeki’s message was that he and Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo have brought Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe to heel, and that Nepad’s pledge of African democracy for Western economic assistance remains on course. Presumably because they are anxious for an African success story, European leaders, including Britain’s Tony Blair, are colluding in this lie. The most grotesque case of wilful blindness was a statement by the Canadian High Commissioner in South Africa, Lucie Edwards, that the “dangerous corner” of Zimbabwe has been “passed relatively smoothly”, that “the first test had been overcome”, and that Mbeki and Obasanjo’s acceptance of Zimbabwe’s suspension from the Commonwealth had saved the day.

What are the facts? This week Zimbabwean human rights monitor the Amani Trust reported that attacks by Zanu-PF youth brigades and “war veterans” have intensified since the election in a “campaign of violent retribution”. Highlighting “a sustained attack on opposition supporters by agents and supporters of the ruling party”, Zimbabwe’s Human Rights NGO forum reported 16 cases of torture and kidnapping in the last two weeks of April alone. Since the election, eight journalists have been prosecuted under the Access to Information Act, which – in an uncanny echo of apartheid press law – criminalises inaccurate reporting. Mugabe’s government may have started to move illegal squatters off white farms, but farm seizures have taken a sinister new twist as Zanu-PF grandees personally evict farmers and grab their land, houses and other possessions. The principal of a well-known Harare secondary school has been prosecuted under the Public Order and Safety Act for questioning the legitimacy of the election in a circular to parents. Famine – the direct consequence of the systematic disruption of commercial agriculture – stalks a land once self-sufficient in staple foods. And this week Zanu-PF unilaterally called off reconciliation talks with the Movement for Democratic Change. The promise of unity government had been Mbeki’s trump card in his attempts to avert Western eyes from a manifestly fraudulent election.

One argument is that until the African Union (AU) is launched, there are no mechanisms for African self-policing on governance and human rights. This is nonsense. We have a regional peer review system in the Southern African Development Community, set up at the April 2000 mini-summit at Victoria Falls. It has been ineffectual, much as the AU peer review mechanism is likely to be.

It is not enough to say that if one is serious about African economic and political resurgence Nepad is the only game in town. With corrupt and brutally repressive governments in place, passively endorsed by South Africa and the West, no amount of aid will make a difference. It is little short of ominous that Nepad is being laid on a foundation of lies and the international betrayal of the rights of ordinary Africans.

The lessons of Jakavula

Last week we urged the Transnet board to suspend Spoornet CEO Zandile Jakavula to allow for a full investigation into evidence presented by the Mail & Guardian suggesting that he irregularly bought a holiday house belonging to the parastatal.

The Transnet board subsequently announced Jakavula’s suspension on the strength of an interim report by Gobodo Incorporated, which they appointed in response to our exposé. The speed of its response, in the virtual absence of pressure from other media “watchdogs”, deserves praise.

The M&G also welcomes the board’s announcement that its investigation will be widened to look at other similar transactions involving Transnet housing assets. A thorough and transparent investigation can only serve to burnish an image tarnished by the failure of its internal control systems and other recent mishaps, including the suspension of former executive directors Bheki Sibiya and Sango Ntsaluba.

At the risk of blowing our own trumpet, the affair highlights why, for all its faults, the M&G remains so important. Jakavula heads a major state-owned organisation and, in any other democratic state, his suspension would have sparked a media feeding frenzy. Yet even after Transnet formally announced his suspension, the public broadcaster and one of South Africa’s largest daily newspapers seemed to ignore it

Whether this is the result of incompetence, a belief that South Africans are allergic to serious news, or a determination to put a rosy gloss on our public life is a moot point. In response to the toughest trading conditions in living memory, worrying trends are emerging in the South African media. One is “sunshine journalism”, evident in the way one major newspaper group covers the presidency. The other is a systematic dumbing down and recourse to froth.

The M&G needs to be more entertaining – and we will try to make it so. But we promise that this will not be at the expense of serious and searching journalism.