Omar Sheikh, a British-born Islamist militant, is waiting to be hanged in Pakistan for a murder he almost certainly did not commit — the murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in 2002.
Both the United States government and Pearl’s wife have since acknowledged that Sheikh was not responsible. Yet the Pakistani government is refusing to try other suspects newly implicated in Pearl’s kidnap and murder for fear that the evidence they produce in court might acquit Sheikh and reveal too much.
Significantly, Sheikh is also the man who, on the instructions of General Mahmoud Ahmed, the then head of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), wired $100 000 before the September 11 2001 attacks to Mohammed Atta, the lead hijacker. It is extraordinary that neither Ahmed nor Sheikh has been charged and brought to trial on this count. Why not?
Ahmed, the paymaster for the hijackers, was in Washington on September 11, and had a series of pre-September 11 top-level meetings in the White House, the Pentagon, the National Security Council, and with George Tenet, then head of the CIA, and Marc Grossman, the Under-Secretary of State for Political Affairs.
When Ahmed was exposed by The Wall Street Journal as having sent the money to the hijackers, he was forced to “retire” by President Pervez Musharraf. Why hasn’t the US demanded that he be questioned and tried in court?
Another person who must know a great deal about what led up to September 11 is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM), allegedly arrested in Rawalpindi on March 1 2003.
A Senate-House intelligence select committee inquiry in July 2003 stated: “KSM appears to be one of [Osama] bin Laden’s most trusted lieutenants and was active in recruiting people to travel outside Afghanistan, including to the US, on behalf of Bin Laden.” According to the report, the implication was that they would be engaged in planning terrorist-related activities.
The report was sent from the CIA to the FBI, but neither agency apparently recognised the significance of a Bin Laden lieutenant sending terrorists to the US and asking them to establish contacts with colleagues already there. Yet The New York Times has since noted that “American officials said that KSM, once al-Qaeda’s top operational commander, personally executed Daniel Pearl … but he was unlikely to be accused of the crime in an American criminal court because of the risk of divulging classified information’.’ Indeed, he may never be brought to trial.
A fourth witness is Sibel Edmonds, a 33-year-old Turkish-American former FBI translator of intelligence, fluent in Farsi, the language spoken mainly in Iran and Afghanistan, who had top-secret security clearance.
She tried to blow the whistle on the cover-up of intelligence that names some of the culprits who orchestrated the September 11 attacks, but is now under two gagging orders that forbid her from testifying in court or mentioning the names of the people or the countries involved. She has been quoted as saying: “My translations of the 9/11 intercepts included [terrorist] money laundering, detailed and date-specific information … if they were to do real investigations, we would see several significant high-level criminal prosecutions in this country [the US] … and believe me, they will do everything to cover this up.”
Furthermore, the FBI, illegally, continues to refuse to release their agent Robert Wright’s manuscript Fatal Betrayals of the Intelligence Mission, and has refused to turn the manuscript over to Senator Richard Shelby, vice-chairperson of the joint intelligence committee charged with investigating the US September 11 intelligence failures. Released on Thursday, the committee’s report cleared the Bush administration of any wrongdoing.
It has been rumoured that Pearl was especially interested in any role played by the US in training or backing the ISI. With CIA backing, the ISI has developed, since the early 1980s, into a parallel structure, a state within a state, with staff and informers estimated by some at 150 000. It wields enormous power over all aspects of government. The case of Ahmed confirms that parts of the ISI directly supported and financed al-Qaeda, and it has long been established that the ISI has acted as go-between in intelligence operations on behalf of the CIA.
Senator Bob Graham, chairperson of the Senate select committee on intelligence, has said: “I think there is very compelling evidence that at least some of the terrorists were assisted, not just in financing … by a sovereign foreign government.”
In that context, Horst Ehmke, former coordinator of the West German secret services, observed: “Terrorists could not have carried out such an operation with four hijacked planes without the support of a secret service.”
That may give meaning to the reaction of Richard Clarke, White House counter-terrorism chief, when he saw the passenger lists: “I was stunned … that there were al-Qaeda operatives on board using names that the FBI knew were al-Qaeda.”
It was just that, as Dale Watson, FBI head of counter-terrorism, told him, the “CIA forgot to tell us about them”. — Â