Fresh photographic evidence seen by United States investigators is believed to reveal that some of the 24 unarmed Iraqis killed in the Iraqi town of Haditha after an American died in a roadside bomb in November were in effect executed, it was reported on Saturday.
According to Congressional and defence officials quoted by the Los Angeles Times, the pictures show wounds to the upper bodies of the victims, who included several women and six children. Some were shot in the head and some in the back.
”There wasn’t a gunfight, there were no pockmarked walls,” the paper reports a congressional aide as saying. And it quotes a US Defence Department official who had been briefed on the contents of the photos as saying ”the wounds indicated execution-style’ shootings”.
US military investigators are probing the events of 19 November 2005, and a picture is gradually emerging of a small group of troops who lost control in the wake of an unrelated attack on their vehicle, which left one of their comrades dead. Other soldiers then helped to cover up the atrocity.
Claims that US marines massacred Iraqi civilians threaten to undermine public support for keeping British troops in the country, the United Kingdom’s most senior military officer said on Saturday. The Chief of Defence Staff, Air Chief Marshal Jock Stirrup, said that reports of the unprovoked killing of up to two dozen unarmed Iraqis would be ”appalling” if proved accurate. ”Our people are in Iraq and other parts of the world doing difficult and dangerous things in unpleasant circumstances on behalf of their country and they need the support of the people in their country. This sort of accusation — and it is at the moment just an accusation, of course — does make that harder to achieve,” he told the BBC.
Two parallel investigations are trying to piece together what happened in the incident. They were sparked by evidence first collected by Time magazine and Iraqi human rights workers. One probe, by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, is examining the killings, while another looks at any cover-up. Both are set to conclude in the next few weeks. It is widely expected that they will end with the courts martial of several marines and possible charges of murder.
Some top US politicians involved with defence issues have already been briefed on the issue and they have told reporters that the evidence is damaging. ”Marines over-reacted … and killed innocent civilians in cold blood,” Congressman John Murtha, a former marine, told the Washington Post. One retired general, David Brahms, told the newspaper: ”When these investigations come out, there’s going to be a firestorm. It will be worse then Abu Ghraib. Nobody was killed at Abu Ghraib.”
The incident happened after a hidden bomb exploded as a US marine unit passed through Haditha. One marine, Miguel Terrazas, was killed. Two other marines were also wounded in the blast.
What happened next is the focus of the investigations. Eyewitnesses and human rights groups believe the marines swept through the town in a lust for revenge. The attack may have lasted for several hours. At the end of it, 24 Iraqi civilians had been killed. They included a 76-year-old amputee and a four-year-old boy. In one house an entire family, including seven children, were attacked with guns and grenades. Only a 13-year-old girl survived.
British soldiers currently in Iraq said they were anxious to distance themselves from the Americans but that Iraqis did seem able to make a distinction. One private, who did not wish to be named, said: ”We are given an education: the Americans get shown how to use a gun. The Iraqis know the difference.”
Captain Victoria Wedgwood-Jones, of 20 Armed Brigade, said: ”When the British come and say we are British, they welcome us warmly.” – Guardian Unlimited Â