/ 25 June 2007

Rich club minds the gap

Globalisation has reduced the bargaining power of unskilled workers and pushed up inequality in many Western countries, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) said this week, urging governments to improve their social safety nets.

The Paris-based rich nations club said in its annual Employment Outlook that the prospect of offshoring was likely to have increased the vulnerability of jobs and wages in developed countries.

The report stressed that, though more open trade and investment policies had a powerful upward effect on living standards around the world, “some workers may lose from globalisation”. It says these were usually those working in industries in Western countries that decline as a result of competition from cheap imports.

“Millions are benefiting from globalisation, but at the same time there’s a feeling something’s wrong with the process,” said the OECD’s secretary general Angel Gurria.

Governments needed to address public concern over jobs and pay in a world being transformed at unprecedented speed by technology, cheap transport and communications, and the rise of China, Russia, India and Brazil with vast pools of cheap labour, he added. Those four countries account for 45% of the world labour supply today, compared to 19% for the OECD countries, which include the United States, Japan and much of Europe.

The report pointed to a “remarkable” fall in the share of wages of national income in OECD member countries in the past couple of decades. Japanese wages have fallen by about a quarter as a share of GDP in the past 30 years, while they have dropped 13% in the 15 wealthier European Union countries and 7% in the US, the report showed. US wages as a share of GDP remain ahead of those in the EU.

The report also showed rising wage inequality in most OECD members over the past decade with the notable exceptions of Spain and Ireland.

In Britain, the gap between rich and poor remained virtually unchanged, although its level was one of the higher ones. The figures run only to 2005, though, since when inequality in the United Kingdom has increased on the government’s own measures. Some of the biggest increases in the OECD were in Poland, Hungary and South Korea. Inequality widened only slightly over the past decade in the US but is at the upper end of the scale.

The US also saw the biggest increase in the wealth of those at the very top of the income scale, along with Canada. Increases in Britain, Japan and France were more subdued, the report showed.

Offshoring, where companies reallocate production or services to cheaper places, was not as big a job-killer in OECD countries as believed, said Gurria.

And offshoring is not the preserve of “Anglo-Saxon” economies such as the UK and US. Indeed, the US remains one of the smallest offshorers in the OECD whereas countries such as Sweden, Norway, Belgium and The Netherlands are among the biggest.

The OECD urged governments to resist protectionist responses and instead adapt employment policies to help people move from one job to another with greater ease and sense of security. It singled out Denmark and Austria as having good policies to help workers adapt to change.

Gurria said some people had lost out, but this was something policies should tackle because globalisation was a positive and inevitable process. “It’s how you make the best out of it,” he said.

“The job for life is dead,” added the OECD labour market expert Raymond Torres. “In order to reap the benefits of globalisation you have to move. Enterprises have to move into new areas, new niches, and people have to move into new enterprises. The thing now is to protect people, but not protect jobs, because some jobs have no future.” — Â