Climate target not radical enough, study shows

One of the world’s leading climate scientists warns on Monday that the European Union and its international partners must urgently rethink targets for cutting carbon dioxide in the atmosphere because of fears they have grossly underestimated the scale of the problem.

In a startling reappraisal of the threat, James Hansen, head of the Nasa Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York, calls for a sharp reduction in carbon-dioxide limits.

Hansen says the EU target of 550 parts per million (ppm) of carbon dioxide—the most stringent in the world—should be slashed to 350ppm. He argues the cut is needed if “humanity wishes to preserve a planet similar to that on which civilisation developed”.

A final version of the paper Hansen co-authored with eight other climate scientists is being published on Monday.
Instead of using theoretical models to estimate the sensitivity of the climate, his team turned to evidence from the Earth’s history, which it says gives a much more accurate picture.

The team studied core samples taken from the bottom of the ocean, which allow carbon-dioxide levels to be tracked millions of years ago. It shows that when the world began to glaciate at the start of the Ice Age about 35-million years ago, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere stood at about 450ppm.

“If you leave us at 450ppm for long enough, it will probably melt all the ice—that’s a sea rise of 75m. What we have found is that the target we have all been aiming for is a disaster—a guaranteed disaster,” Hansen said.

At levels as high as 550ppm, the world would warm by six degrees Celsius, the paper finds. Previous estimates had suggested warming would be just three degrees Celsius at that point.

Hansen has long been a prominent figure in climate-change science. He was one of the first to bring the crisis to the world’s attention in testimony to the United States Congress in the 1980s.

However, his relationship with the Bush administration has been frosty. In 2005, he accused the White House and Nasa of trying to censor him. He has steadily revised his analysis of the scale of the global warming and was himself one of the architects of a 450ppm target. But he told Britain’s Guardian newspaper: “I realise that was too high.”

The fundamental reason for his reassessment was what he calls “slow feedback” mechanisms that are only now becoming fully understood. They amplify the rise in temperature caused by increasing the concentration of greenhouse gases. Ice and snow reflect sunlight but when they melt, they leave exposed ground that absorbs more heat.

As ice sheets recede, the warming effect is compounded. Satellite technology available over the past three years has shown that the ice sheets are melting much faster than expected, with Greenland and west Antarctica both losing mass.

Hansen said that he now regards as “implausible” the view of many climate scientists that the shrinking of the ice sheets would take thousands of years. “If we follow business as usual, I can’t see how west Antarctica could survive a century. We are talking about a sea-level rise of at least a couple of metres this century.”

The revised target is likely to prompt criticism that he is setting the bar unrealistically high. With the US administration still acting as a drag on international efforts, climate campaigners are struggling even to get a 450ppm target to stick.

Hansen said his findings were not a recipe for despair. The good news, he said, is that reserves of fossil fuels have been exaggerated, so an alternative source of energy will have to be rapidly put in place in any case. Other measure could include a moratorium on coal power stations that would bring carbon-dioxide levels to below 400ppm.—guardian.co.uk Â

Client Media Releases

What makes IIE Rosebank College cool?
UKZN supports #CrazySocks4Docs campaign
The right to take refuge
Taking Sanral to Upington