Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

As Clinton’s bid ends, sexism debate will not

Was she or wasn’t she?

Hillary Clinton’s candidacy may soon be a thing of the past but debate will rage over whether the first woman to make it so far in the United States presidential contest was a victim of sexism by the media or in the eyes of the public.

Her campaign draws to a close on Saturday when she is set to back apparent Democratic nominee Barack Obama.

For some, there’s no question that sexism was intricately woven through Clinton’s groundbreaking effort.

They cite T-shirts saying ”Life’ a Bitch, so Don’t Vote for One,” newsman Chris Matthews pinching Clinton on the cheek, descriptions of her as bitchy and shrill or newscasters bantering over a pen that played a soundtrack of her laugh.

Others say the claim of sexism is laughable. Clinton could not have gotten as far as she did without being the wife of a president so can’t complain about being a woman, they say.

”Women are held to a different standard, and it hurt her,” said New York-based pollster Mickey Blum. ”It’s also a reason a lot of women rallied to her and have stuck with her, even more than they would have, because there was a sense she was being treated unfairly.”

Debate is inevitable as long as some hear sexism and others don’t hear it at all, said Elizabeth Ossoff, professor of political psychology at St. Anselm College in New Hampshire.

Consider the incident when hecklers interrupted Clinton with shouts and signs reading ”Iron My Shirt,” she said.

”What if someone raised a sign reading, ‘Shine my Shoes’ with Obama speaking? We all know that’s not OK,” she said.

”When somebody says ‘Iron My Shirt,’ there’s an element that it’s not OK but there’s an element that it’s kind of funny.

”People are comfortable with sexism and accept it,” she said.

Among those seeing sexism was Clinton herself, who responded to the hecklers by saying, ”Ah, the remnants of sexism, alive and well.”

Months later in a Washington Post interview, she decried ”sexism” in the campaign. ”It’s been deeply offensive to millions of women,” Clinton said.

Those claims make some conservative observers angry.

”Charges of sexism have become Hillary’s rote strategy for evading scrutiny,” commentator Camille Paglia recently wrote. ”Will every losing woman candidate now turn on the waterworks and claim to be maimed by male pride and prejudice?

”Sexism has nothing to do with it,” she said.

‘Be a guy’
Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan called the charge untrue, noting Clinton got support from ”tough” men across the country.

”Hillary got her share, more than her share, of their votes. She should be a guy and say thanks,” Noonan wrote. ”It is blame-gaming, whining, a way of not taking responsibility, of not seeing your flaws and addressing them.”

Those who do detect sexism say it can be subtle as using the term Mrs Clinton but not Mr Obama or Mr McCain or the reporters covering Clinton who refer to women as ”chicks” and ”girls”.

Glamour magazine, in a recent online survey, found 12% of respondents thought sexism played a big role.

But roughly a third each found sexism’s role was moderate, minor or nonexistent. Seeing sexism as largely an issue of the past, some women find the notion that they should back a candidate merely because she’s a woman insulting.

And even if sexism was a factor, it was not Clinton’s undoing, said political strategist Tanya Melich.

”I really believe there was a lot of sexism on cable television and talk shows, but I don’t think it made the significant difference in her losing,” said Melich. ”Their problem was their strategy.”

The debate gives some feminists like Eleanor Smeal, founder of the Feminist Majority Foundation, renewed drive.

”One of the legacies of the Clinton campaign is that it’s been a wake-up call, really, to the women’s movement of how far we have to go,” she said. ”We have a lot of work to do. We are in much worse shape than we thought.” – Reuters 2008

Subscribe to the M&G

Thanks for enjoying the Mail & Guardian, we’re proud of our 36 year history, throughout which we have delivered to readers the most important, unbiased stories in South Africa. Good journalism costs, though, and right from our very first edition we’ve relied on reader subscriptions to protect our independence.

Digital subscribers get access to all of our award-winning journalism, including premium features, as well as exclusive events, newsletters, webinars and the cryptic crossword. Click here to find out how to join them.

Related stories

WELCOME TO YOUR M&G

If you’re reading this, you clearly have great taste

If you haven’t already, you can subscribe to the Mail & Guardian for less than the cost of a cup of coffee a week, and get more great reads.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

Advertising

Subscribers only

Bloated Sassa to make staff cuts

The social security agency has ‘lost’ R2-billion on unnecessary salaries and through wasteful expenditure

SANDF’s ‘dignity’ comes with a R200mn price tag

Find out about the SANDF’s new uniform, which is costing taxpayers close to R200-million, while mission-critical equipment is not maintained

More top stories

Lipstick, blush and Boko Haram: Meet the make-up artists of...

Despite the insurgency, which has killed many people, caused the displacement of millions, confines women to traditional roles and forbids the education of girls, women are fending for their families and starting lucrative businesses. Meet the make-up artists of Maiduguri

Phiyega bid to sidestep Marikana massacre dismissed

Ex-police commissioner Riah Phiyega hoped to quash findings including colluding in a cover-up and misleading the public about what happened at the platinum mine in 2012.

Warring ANC factions united in questioning SAA deal

Four unhappy high-ranking party members say the SAA sale was never discussed at the NEC

Ice skating champion shows off the Cape Flats talent at...

A young ice-skating champion has beaten the odds and brought home a national gold medal
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…
×