To enjoy the full Mail & Guardian online experience: please upgrade your browser
29 Sep 2009 15:58
Iran will not discuss any issues related to its nuclear “rights” in the Islamic Republic’s meeting with six world powers in Geneva on Thursday, its nuclear energy agency chief said on Tuesday.
Ali Akbar Salehi, head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organisation, made clear this included a newly disclosed uranium enrichment plant which has drawn Western condemnation.
His comments seemed certain to disappoint the United States, which has called on Iran to come clean about its nuclear programme, which the West suspects is aimed at making bombs. Tehran insists it needs the technology to generate power.
“We are not going to discuss anything related to our nuclear rights, but we can discuss about disarmament, we can discuss about non-proliferation and other general issues,” Salehi told a news conference.
“The new site is part of our rights and there is no need to discuss it,” he said, adding Tehran would not abandon its nuclear activities “even for a second”.
The US and its Western allies have made clear they will focus on Iran’s nuclear programme at the Geneva meeting.
Iran has offered wide-ranging security talks.
Salehi was earlier quoted as saying that Iran would soon inform the United Nations nuclear watchdog of a timetable for inspection of the new plant, its second uranium enrichment facility.
Iran also cautioned Western powers it could curb cooperation further if they repeated “past mistakes”.
An Iranian MP, Mohammad Karamirad, suggested that Parliament might advocate withdrawal from the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) if Thursday’s Geneva talks with major powers fail and “if the Zionists [Israel] and America continue their pressure on Iran”—a reference to policies including economic sanctions.
Washington has suggested possible new sanctions on banking and the oil and gas industry.
Iran’s Irna news agency quoted Karamirad, a conservative and member of Parliament’s foreign policy and national security commission, as saying Iran could close the door completely to cooperation with world nuclear authorities.
“If the Zionists and America continue their pressure on Iran and if the talks ... do not reach a conclusion, then Parliament will take a clear and transparent position, such as Iran’s withdrawal from the NPT,” he said.
Parliament can formally oblige the government to take such a step, as happened when Iran stopped permitting wide-ranging snap UN nuclear inspections in 2006, but Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has final say on matters of state.
Top Iranian officials have repeatedly said Tehran has no intention to leave the NPT, under which its nuclear facilities are subject to regular UN nuclear watchdog inspections, or seek nuclear weapons it says violate the tenets of Islam.
Salehi told reporters on Tuesday: “We are acting in the framework of the NPT. We are committed to our commitments.”
Comments by Western and Iranian officials suggested little optimism ahead of the Thursday’s rare meeting of the P5+1—permanent United Nations Security Council members China, Britain, France, the US and Russia, as well as Germany—with Iran.
“My expectation, or my hope, is that we will be able to get ... the guarantees from Tehran, that the programme in which they are engaged in is a peaceful programme,” EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana told reporters in Gothenburg, Sweden.
“I don’t think it will be easy to ask for, but we will continue to engage.”
Last week’s news of a second uranium enrichment plant, under construction south of Tehran, added urgency to the Geneva talks. Uranium in less refined form can be used for power generation but in a more highly refined state is used in nuclear bombs.
Iranian missile tests on Sunday and Monday added to tension with Western powers, who fear a hardline leadership in the Islamic Republic could ultimately use a threat of nuclear attack to pursue its political ends in the Middle East and beyond.
Interfax news agency quoted a senior Russian diplomat as saying missile test launches by Iran should not be used as an additional argument for imposing sanctions against Tehran.
Iran denies any plans for nuclear weapons and portrays international pressure on it over its programme as a Western plot, with deep historic roots, to isolate and destabilise the country.
Iranian lawmakers signed a statement expressing support for negotiations based on proposals put forward by Iran, which do not mention Tehran’s own nuclear programme.
“We recommend the 5+1 to use this historic opportunity,” the 239 MPs said in a statement quoted by state broadcaster Irib.
“If the group of 5+1 repeats past mistakes instead of using this opportunity, the Iranian parliament would take other decisions as it did in the past.”
In 2006, the Iranian Parliament passed a Bill obliging the government to review the level of its cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog after the United Nations approved sanctions on Tehran over its atomic programme.
The Geneva meeting is the first such encounter since the June re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad stirred mass protests in Tehran and signs of division in the leadership over accusations of vote fixing. It is also the first since President Barack Obama took office, seeking to revive contacts.
Russia, though cautious on sanctions, has expressed concern about Iranian missile launches and about Tehran’s nuclear programme. President Dmitry Medvedev has said “other means” could be employed if Geneva talks failed.—Reuters
Create Account | Lost Your Password?