Copenhagen scientists slam ‘Climategate’

Negotiators and top scientists at United Nations climate talks on Monday slammed the theft of emails from experts at a British university as a bid to discredit overwhelming opinion about man-made global warming.

At ceremonies opening the 12-day negotiations, the head of the UN’s Nobel-winning panel of scientists branded the so-called “Climategate” affair as a suspected attempt to tarnish his organisation.

“Given the wide-ranging nature of change that is likely to be taken in hand, some naturally find it inconvenient to accept its inevitability,” said Rajendra Pachauri, chairperson of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

“The recent incident of stealing the emails of scientists at the University of East Anglia shows that some would go to the extent of carrying out illegal acts, perhaps in an attempt to discredit the IPCC.”

Pachauri proudly defended the IPCC’s reputation as an arena for weighing scientific evidence fairly, neutrally and objectively.

The emails, hacked last month, have been seized on by climate sceptics as evidence that scientists distorted data to dramatise the threat of global warming.

Some of the thousands of messages, purloined from scientists at Britain’s East Anglia, a top centre for climate research, expressed frustration at the scientists’ inability to explain what they described as a temporary slowdown in warming.

They also discussed ways to counter the campaigns of climate naysayers.

The affair, dubbed “Climategate”, has provoked a firestorm of controversy, especially in the United States.

“It has sucked up all the oxygen,” said James Overland, an Arctic specialist with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), in Copenhagen Monday to open a US-sponsored science centre.

“It just happens to be the topic of the moment,” said Jonathan Pershing, deputy head of the US delegation at the December 7 to 18 UN talks.

“It is a misrepresentation of the robustness of science. What we end with is that our understanding of the issues is not different … I look at this and I think to myself, it’s opportunistic.”

Major oil exporter Saudi Arabia, though, said the affair had “definitely shaken” confidence in climate scientists and demanded an international investigation, rather than an internal probe by the IPCC.

“The level of trust is definitely shaken, especially now that we are about to conclude an agreement that … is going to mean sacrifices for our economies,” said Mohammed al-Sabban, the kingdom’s top climate negotiator.

Sabban called for an “independent” international investigation, saying that the UN climate science body was unqualified to carry it out.

The IPCC co-won the 2007 Nobel Peace prize for its series of massive reports on global warming.

Its landmark publication, the Fourth Assessment Report, declared that the evidence of warming was “unequivocal” and damage to glaciers, snowfall and changing seasons were among the signs that climate change was already on the march.

The alarm triggered by this report helped drive a two-year process towards Copenhagen, which is tasked with forging a deal to reduce carbon emissions and help poor countries cope with the impacts of climate change.

In remarks to Agence France-Presse, Pachauri said he did not believe that the affair would sway the opinion of people who had carefully weighed the evidence for or against climate change.

“I think people are informed enough to realise that the Fourth Assessment Report is completely objective, totally unbiased and solid in its scientific assessment.

“The only debate is who is behind it, I think we should catch the culprits,” he said. — AFP

Subscribe to the M&G

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

Related stories

COP25 climate summit: what’s happened?

The real test will come next year in Glasgow, when countries have to make concrete commitments to reducing emissions

Slash emissions now or miss 1.5°C goal, UN warns

The UNEP said that global emissions need to fall by 7.6%, each year, every year until 2030 to limit global temperature rises to 1.5°C

Planned fossil fuel output swamps Paris climate goals

The 2015 Paris Agreement calls for blocking global warming at well below 2C, and 1.5C if possible

Ecological land grab: food vs fuel vs forests

A world of narrowing options threatens to pit biofuels, forests and food production against each other

In defence of Zindzi Mandela’s obvious truths

The ambassador was simply stating facts in her tweets about how white people stole the land, writes Mcebo Dlamini

On climate change, a shift towards civil disobedience

Since October, the world has seen a crescendo of grassroots protests around climate change, especially in western Europe and North America

Sekhukhune’s five-year battle for water back in court

The residents of five villages are calling for the district municipal manager to be arrested

Fees free fall, independent schools close

Parents have lost their jobs or had salaries cut; without state help the schools just can’t survive

Vaccine trial results due in December

If successful, it will then have to be manufactured and distributed

White men still rule and earn more

Women and black people occupy only a few seats at the JSE table, the latest PwC report has found

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…

The best local and international journalism

handpicked and in your inbox every weekday