To enjoy the full Mail & Guardian online experience: please upgrade your browser
21 Oct 2010 06:00
National Press Freedom Day on October 19 is a fitting anniversary to take stock of threats to South African journalism—and especially of the responses and what they might portend.
According to a report released on the weekend, up till 20 10, South Africans took press freedom for granted and became passive around the issue.
Further, says the report, many South Africans have not seen themselves properly reflected in the media, and so have had little interest in supporting media freedom.
There are also those who prioritise issues like housing or health and don’t yet see the importance of free expression as a precondition for progress on these issues. But all this is beginning to change, says the document.
There are new links being forged between civil society and media. And though the document originated in August before the recent “Right2Know” campaign got going, it refers to the SOS Campaign for Public Broadcasting as one example of the new times.
These insights are part of a report called the “African Media Barometer South Africa 20 10”. Presented in booklet form, the document follows on more than 46 earlier Barometers covering a total of 25 African countries, all underwritten by the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (who also sponsor this column).
Each national report is the result of in-depth discussion by five civil society experts and five media practitioners in each given country.
The group allocates scores under 45 headings that are derived from the African Union’s Declaration of Principles of Freedom of Expression. In general, four broad areas are assessed: freedom of expression; media diversity and independence; the health of broadcasting; and journalistic professionalism.
The latest South African Barometer gives the country an overall score of 3 out of 5 down from 3,5 in 20 08, and 3,2 in 20 06. In other words, while the country meets some aspects of the African Union’s benchmarks, there is still a lot of room for improvement.
Amongst the negative features that should be addressed, the report notes:
It also registers extra-governmental threats to journalism:
In addition to the new and broad mobilisation around communication rights, the report also shows much else on the positive side:
Other pertinent points in the Barometer are:
The Barometer report was released at a research colloquium of 18 journalism schools held in Grahamstown on the weekend. The event reduced the volume of inflamed rhetoric and saw intellectual debate between academics and influential ANC members like Pallo Jordan, Ismail Vavi and Lumko Mtimde.
Many of the research papers presented dealt with criticisms and improvements in press self-regulation and accountability. They are now being fed into a review by the Press Council of its functioning. In one, I proposed a method for drawing on international experiences in order to shape recommendations to reform the Council.
Different views on the right to information, expression and media freedom in South Africa are not about to enter an age of harmony. But there is emerging accord on some of the problems, an increasing recognition of complexities, and an openness to new ideas.
Combined with wider stakeholder involvement in the debate, the result seems to be a mellowing of the antagonism between ANC and the press. That’s not a bad outcome for a National Press Freedom Day.
*This column is made possible by support from fesmedia Africa, the Media Project of the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung in Africa, www.fesmedia.org. The views expressed in it are those of the author.
RSS feed for this column: //www.mg.co.za/rss/guy-berger
Read more from Guy Berger
Create Account | Lost Your Password?