Sexwale rapped over ‘evil farmers’ comment

Comments made by Human Settlements Minister Tokyo Sexwale did not constitute hate speech, but were insensitive, the South African Human Rights Commission said on Thursday.

A complaint was brought against Sexwale by AgriSA over comments he made during an interview on the South African Broadcasting Corporation’s Morning Live on January 28 2010.

In the interview, Sexwale said: “The growing number of squatter camps in South Africa is caused by people who are kicked out by very, very evil farmers … fearful of the fact that laws say you’ve got to provide these people with security of comfort …”

Agri SA complained that the statement contained accusations that were impossible to substantiate and which damaged the reputation of commercial farmers.

On Thursday, rights commissioner Sandi Baai said while the comments did not impinge on constitutionally-enshrined human rights, “those holding public office should think before they make statements”.

She said the commission found that Sexwale had only expressed his opinion on the cause of the increase in the number of squatter camps.

AgriSA mulls appeal
AgriSA said it would consider appealing the commission’s finding.

Baai said the commission interpreted Sexwale’s remarks as referring to “certain very, very evil farmers” and not farmers in general.

It also took into account that the comment was made in response to a question on the causes of the increase in squatter camps in South Africa.

She said the definition of hate speech involved “incitement to do harm”.

Also, a causal link between advocacy of hatred for a group and harm caused, was necessary to fulfil the definition.

AgriSA president Johannes Möller said in a statement that in the context of the country’s record of farm attacks, the organisation had a duty to challenge Sexwale’s comments and point out their implications on behalf of commercial farmers.

He said a factual basis was lacking in most cases where farm labour practices had been called into question.

Baai said the commission had considered whether Sexwale should apologise, but had found there were insufficient grounds for this.

The commission recommended that all South Africans, particularly those in public office, refrain from making statements or expressing opinions that were potentially offensive to others.

“Instead, these officials should use such public platforms to communicate in a manner that respects and upholds the rights of others, promotes the values of the Constitution and contributes towards the building of a nation that is united in its diversity.” – Sapa

We make it make sense

If this story helped you navigate your world, subscribe to the M&G today for just R30 for the first three months

Subscribers get access to all our best journalism, subscriber-only newsletters, events and a weekly cryptic crossword.”

Related stories


Already a subscriber? Sign in here


Latest stories

Shell v Wild Coast: Science, research and erring on the...

Court applicants have argued that the company should be required to conduct an environmental impact assessment, based on the best available science, which has advanced considerably since Shell’s permit to conduct seismic surveys was granted

How spies shape South Africa’s political path

From Mbeki to Zuma to Ramaphosa, the facts and fictions of the intelligence networks have shadowed political players and settled power struggles

I’m just a lawyer going to court, says attorney on...

The Mthatha attorney is angered by a tweet alleging he sways the high court and the Judicial Services Commission

Death of Zimbabwe’s funeral business

Burial societies and companies have collapsed and people can no longer afford decent burials for their family members

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…