Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

No sunset clause for Constitution

President Jacob Zuma’s speechwriters made sure that he genuflected before the Constitution in his State of the Nation address last week but a few days later, in an unscripted interview, he trampled on it. None of the subsequent spin can obscure what we saw of the president’s real intentions for the judiciary in general and the Constitutional Court in particular. Zuma wants, through a “review” of the judiciary, pliant, homogenised Constitutional Court judges whose logic resonates with his own. He told the Star: “We don’t want to review the Constitutional Court, we want to review its powers. It is after experience that some of the decisions are not decisions that every other judge in the Constitutional Court agrees with. There are dissenting judgments we read. You will find that the dissenting one has more logic than the one that enjoyed the majority. What do you do in that case?”

The president’s office moved swiftly to dress up his in flagrante moment by releasing a statement saying his words had to be viewed in the context of a Cabinet decision in November last year to mandate Justice Minister Jeff Radebe to “conduct an assessment of the impact of the judgments of the Constitutional Court on the transformation of society in the 17 years of democracy”. And that his intentions, and that of the review, were to help address apartheid’s legacy and “contribute in shaping our evolving constitutional jurisprudence”.

There is a paucity of information about who will be involved in the review and the weight its findings will carry. But it is already drawing legal criticism.

The Black Lawyers’ Association this week noted that such action by the executive showed a lack of a basic appreciation of the tenets underlying the separation of powers. It also pointed out that even if the majority ANC managed to get 75% of the parliamentary support and support from six of the nine provinces in the National Council of Provinces required to pass a Bill to amend the Constitution and the powers of the court, it would still come up against that very same court in a challenge.

The association called the review and any subsequent attempts to make constitutional changes a “tedious exercise”. It is astonishing that the executive displays such ignorance of the rule of law and a penchant for the apartheid days of parliamentary sovereignty with its untrammelled powers, which have so scarred many South Africans.

The Zuma administration is becoming increasingly — and deliberately — obtuse about constitutional principles in its dealings with the judiciary, the media and ordinary citizens. The National Prosecuting Authority argued that there were “certain categories” of decisions made by it that need not stand up to judicial review or public scrutiny. The Supreme Court of Appeal bench was astonished and Justice Mohamed Navsa, especially, voiced his “concern” that the NPA would be advancing such a position.

It is a position that resonates with that of Zuma — an intelligence operative and head of Mbokodo, the ANC’s secretive internal intelligence unit. South Africans deserve an independent Constitutional Court and transparent public institutions to ensure its hard-won democracy. The nation has, after all, endured bloodshed and social injustice to attain a freedom described by former president Nelson Mandela as “so glorious an achievement” that “the sun shall never set on it”. Mr Zuma, we will not let the sun go down on us.

Subscribe for R500/year

Thanks for enjoying the Mail & Guardian, we’re proud of our 36 year history, throughout which we have delivered to readers the most important, unbiased stories in South Africa. Good journalism costs, though, and right from our very first edition we’ve relied on reader subscriptions to protect our independence.

Digital subscribers get access to all of our award-winning journalism, including premium features, as well as exclusive events, newsletters, webinars and the cryptic crossword. Click here to find out how to join them and get a 57% discount in your first year.

Related stories


If you’re reading this, you clearly have great taste

If you haven’t already, you can subscribe to the Mail & Guardian for less than the cost of a cup of coffee a week, and get more great reads.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here


Subscribers only

Basic web lessons for South Africa: Government hacks point to...

Recent cyberattacks at the department of justice and the space agency highlight the extent of our naïveté

If the inflation-driving supply strain in the US lasts, it...

In South Africa, a strong trade surplus, buoyed by robust commodity prices, will cushion our economy against pressure arising from US policy

More top stories

Ramaphosa hits the right notes as he urges Cosatu to...

Cosatu meets to deliberate on its support for the governing party in the upcoming local government elections

DA insists IEC favoured the ANC after Constitutional Court dismisses...

The apex court’s dismissal of the Democratic Alliance’s application to declare reopening candidate registration unlawful came as no surprise

‘Factional’ ANC Veterans League chastised by Motlanthe

ANC Limpopo leaders called on the election committee to change the candidate lists in favour of Ramaphosa faction days before Motlanthe’s report on factions in the party

Sisters pave the way with ecobricks

The durable bricks are made from 30% recycled plastic, some of which they collect from a network of 50 waste pickers

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…