Democracy the victim in divided Egypt

President Mohamed Morsi's declaration of legal immunity was an authoritarian tactic. (AFP)

President Mohamed Morsi's declaration of legal immunity was an authoritarian tactic. (AFP)

The latest crisis to sweep Egypt has inflicted considerable damage and now threatens the country's transition to ­democracy. The rules of political competition have not been followed and politics has veered towards violence, harming both the opponents and supporters of President Mohamed Morsi.

Ostensibly, the issue has been Morsi's constitutional ­declaration. The Muslim Brotherhood, or Ikhwan, deemed this declaration necessary to pre-empt a ruling from the Constitutional Court that would have in effect ended the powers of the president and paralysed the political transition.

The president has every reason to be sceptical of the court's intentions.
All its judges were appointed under Mubarak and some have never concealed their hostility to the Muslim Brotherhood.

The president's declaration was nonetheless a big mistake. By declaring his decisions immune from legal challenge – albeit for a limited period – Morsi angered a great many judges. Worse, his actions gave rise to the formation of a peculiar alliance between liberals, nationalists and some revolutionary youth groups on the one hand, and what are known in Egypt as felool, or "remnants", on the other. The "remnants" include various people associated with Mubarak's regime, including leading military, security and judicial figures, rural and provincial leaders of the disbanded National Democratic Party and business people who amassed huge fortunes in the Mubarak era. This odd alliance believes that the state has been hijacked by the Muslim Brotherhood and must be regained at any cost.

Massive rallies and violent clashes followed Morsi's declaration and the Muslim Brotherhood found itself increasingly isolated, with Salafist Islamists its only allies.

But the opposition has also made a grave error. Inadvertently, the liberal, nationalist and youth elements in the political opposition have given the remnants an opportunity to return to centre stage. They have allowed their own Ikhwanophobia to dominate, giving more weight to their hatred of the Islamist forces than their evident love of ­democracy. In their desire to topple the Muslim Brotherhood, they seem prepared to commit the greatest of profanities: to ally themselves with the former regime's forces; they even ignore the violence of the notorious baltagiya, or criminal gangs.

Latest standoff
These thugs were used against the revolutionaries of Tahrir Square and leaders of Mubarak's party and associated business people were accused of hiring them. The irony of the latest standoff is that the thugs have been used again to initiate bloody clashes with Morsi's supporters, leading to further attacks and counterattacks between his supporters and opponents.  

The country is now so polarised that we see two camps without a go-between to mediate and perhaps reconcile them. When the president called for a national dialogue meeting, it was attended by 54 national leaders and legal figures but boycotted by the representatives of the main opposition forces, which continue to call for more protests.

Here, the opposition has made another mistake. Appearing hell-bent on confrontation, it has strengthened the conviction of Morsi's supporters that it is seeking to overthrow the legitimate authority of the democratically elected president. This impression was reinforced when opposition leaders ­escalated their confrontational rhetoric even after the abolition of the declaration, calling for the postponement of the referendum on the constitution, scheduled for December 15. This was perceived by many Egyptians as contempt for the will of the people, an impression reinforced when one of the most prominent liberal intellectuals, Alaa Al Aswany, suggested that all illiterates should be banned from voting in the referendum: 26% of Egypt's population is illiterate and 33% of women.

This battle is unlikely to be the last in Egypt's political transition. The internal political scene is complex and made more so by external interference either by those who worry that a successful Egypt might restrict their regional colonial or expansionist ambitions, or encourage their own people to revolt.

The acrimony underscores the need to build consensus on the rules of political conduct, based on the recognition of political diversity and the rejection of violence. The opposition must get used to the fact that Islamists are an organic part of Egyptian political life. Attempts to exclude them would not propel the liberals or nationalists to power, but plunge the country into violence and extremism.

As for the Muslim Brotherhood, it must become comfortable with political engagement. It must be open to all components of society to reassure sceptics that it does not intend to change the rules of democratic politics. Numerical majority in a nascent democracy is not a mandate for authoritarianism. – © Guardian News & Media 2012

Wadah Khanfar is a former ­director general of the al-Jazeera TV ­network

Client Media Releases

Five ways to use Mobi-gram
Leopards Lair 2019: winner fights period poverty
MTN gears up for Black Friday sale promotion
Software licensing should be getting simpler, but it's not
Utility outages: looking at the big picture