Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

Power struggle jams nuclear fix-up

Eskom has inexplicably delayed for three years a multibillion-rand tender to replace ageing steam generators at the Koeberg nuclear power station.

Bidders are complaining about political interference in the estimated R2.6-billion tender and a ­senior Eskom executive has warned that the parastatal is flirting with “an urgent nuclear safety matter” because of the delay.

The two bidders are a consortium led by the French nuclear vendor, Areva, and their American-Japanese rival, Westinghouse. The generators produce power from pressurised steam created by the heat from the nuclear reactor core.

Eskom executives are desperate to finalise the contract to allow the long overdue overhaul of the steam generators.

However, sources close to the ­process say that the board – and its controversial acting chief executive Collin Matjila in particular – have raised numerous objections to their recommended contractor, believed to be Westinghouse.

Matjila, a non-executive director, chaired the board’s tender committee from 2011 until his appointment as acting chief executive in April this year, but in his new role he allegedly continues to place hurdles in the way of awarding a contract.

Eskom originally awarded the lion’s share of the tender in April 2011 to Westinghouse, and a smaller portion to Areva. But former public enterprises minister Malusi Gigaba stopped it, because large contracts require additional political approval.

Eskom invited both companies to bid again in 2012. Having dragged their feet on a decision for well over a year, the utility summoned bidders to a “competitive negotiation” on Tuesday this week – the equivalent of a sudden-death penalty shoot-out.

This development could be seen as a last-ditch attempt by the board ­tender committee to redirect the process before they are replaced. Incoming Public Enterprises Minister Lynne Brown told Talk Radio 702 in early June that she would replace Matjila and his fellow directors by the end of June.

A source well acquainted with one of the bidders’ participation in the tender said: “This board has taken three years to get nowhere on this contract. Now suddenly they rush to hold a one-day competitive negotiation presentation. Maybe they want to push this thing through before the new minister has come to grips with her portfoli o.”

Outcome is not yet known

The inability of Eskom’s executive, board and the minister to see eye to eye on the contract for more than three years has heightened suspicion that Matjila and interests aligned to him want the French bid to succeed.

Detailed questions sent to Eskom this week, including about Matjila’s role and alleged motives, went largely unanswered. In a short statement, an Eskom spokesperson wrote: “Eskom has strong governance processes in place to protect the integrity of procurement transactions. We follow a robust commercial process and take every precaution to ensure that the adjudication process is thorough and defendable. We are mindful of the need to be transparent on such matters but require respect for the process, which is still under review.”

Attempts to contact Matjila in his own capacity were unsuccessful. But a source sympathetic to Matjila says that he is only standing up to other interests backing Westinghouse.


Koeberg’s history is entwined with both Areva and Westinghouse. The French built the plant for the apartheid government using American reactor technology.

The stakes are high for both ­companies because they have been overtaken in the race for the much bigger contract for six new nuclear reactors by Russian and Chinese state-owned nuclear construction companies with stronger balance sheets, and Brics (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa)membership.

Koeberg’s six steam generators date to the mid-1980s and must be replaced soon to extend the station’s life for another 30 years.

With its two reactors running at full capacity, Koeberg supplies 5% of the ­country’s total energy output. The Western Cape draws much of its power from the plant.

A year after Gigaba rescinded the tender, Eskom reissued it. Another year passed until the executive procure­ment committee recommended a winner – understood to be Westinghouse – to the board in November last year.

But the board’s tender committee that reviews the executive procurement committee’s tender process and approves the award has since raised objections.

These led to the contract being changed back to the split award, mooted back in 2011, and then changed back again to a single award proposed last November.

The source acquainted with one of the bidders’ participation said that Matjila appointed a legal specialist to review the recommendation while he chaired the board committee; and then ordered a second, overlapping legal review after he became chief executive.

The competing legal reviews apparently caused consternation among Eskom executives, when one of the reviews accused them of bias, said the source.

Eskom denied that Matjila continued to play a role in the contract decision after becoming acting chief executive because he had stepped down from the board tender committee to avoid a conflict of interest.

A well-placed Eskom source told amaBhungane that the board’s delay in approving the executive committee’s recommendation contributed to Matjila’s predecessor, former chief executive Brian Dames, walking away from the utility after a 27-year career.

“Dames wrote at least twice to the board, documenting his views. He felt that his team had answered all the board tender committee’s questions, and that the process needed to be concluded because it had become an urgent nuclear safety matter.”

Dames declined to comment because he is no longer at Eskom. He referred questions to the utility. – Additional reporting by Matuma Letsoalo

* Got a tip-off for us about this story? Click here.

The M&G Centre for Investigative Journalism (amaBhungane) produced this story. All views are ours. See for our stories, activities and funding sources.

Subscribe to the M&G

Thanks for enjoying the Mail & Guardian, we’re proud of our 36 year history, throughout which we have delivered to readers the most important, unbiased stories in South Africa. Good journalism costs, though, and right from our very first edition we’ve relied on reader subscriptions to protect our independence.

Digital subscribers get access to all of our award-winning journalism, including premium features, as well as exclusive events, newsletters, webinars and the cryptic crossword. Click here to find out how to join them.

Lionel Faull
Lionel Faull
Lionel is a reporter at the Mail & Guardian Centre for Investigative Journalism, Amabhungane.

Related stories


If you’re reading this, you clearly have great taste

If you haven’t already, you can subscribe to the Mail & Guardian for less than the cost of a cup of coffee a week, and get more great reads.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here


Subscribers only

Cape Flats gangsters, children die in fight over turf

Extortion rackets are part of a corrupt system that includes religious leaders, councillors, police and syndicates

Tobacco farmers want the taxman to do more to control...

The Black Tobacco Farmers’ Association the introduction of a minimum price level for cigarettes

More top stories

Cape Flats gangsters, children die in fight over turf

Extortion rackets are part of a corrupt system that includes religious leaders, councillors, police and syndicates

Father and son abandon gangs to start a project of...

After spending more than 40 years in a life of gangsterism, Ralph Haricombe’s life changed after his son asked him to change his life

Predators: Beauties or beasts?

How farmers perceive jackal and caracal — as ‘beautiful’ or ‘thieves’ — determines whether they will tolerate them on their livestock farms

Creecy taken to court over oil, gas plan

An environment group says its application is a ‘watershed’ case for stopping deep sea exploration

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…