To enjoy the full Mail & Guardian online experience: please upgrade your browser
Samuel Ouma Oyoo
24 Jul 2015 00:00
Graphic: John McCann
Mother-tongue education has long been a political powder keg in South Africa. This started with the 1976 Soweto uprisings when school children staged protests after Afrikaans became the medium of instruction.
Today, the country’s policies promote multilingualism.
But its schools are battling with too few African language teachers.
This means most of South Africa’s 11 official languages take a back seat to English and Afrikaans when it comes to formal school learning and teaching.
Language rights are enshrined in South Africa’s Constitution and there’s an ongoing debate about how best to promote multilingualism in schools.
But is this debate relevant when it comes to teaching science? My answer is no. Instead, science should be taught in only one language from grade 4 onwards.
This is a conclusion reached after more than three decades as a school physics teacher, a science teacher educator and through sustained research about language for the effective learning of school science.
In the past five years, this research has been conducted as part of the language and learning of physical science project at Wits University’s Marang Centre for Mathematics and Science Education.
It has involved about 3?500 physical science pupils from 35 high schools in Johannesburg and teaching students from Wits. A total of 70 physical science teachers have also participated. Data has been collected through word tests and structured interviews.
Science is a practical subject, but it also has its own language. Teachers must explain what they are doing when setting up an experiment, for instance, and use everyday language to clarify complex concepts.
In South African schools, a language’s appropriateness for learning and teaching is judged mainly by whether it is the pupils’ mother tongue, no matter what subject is being taught.
Teachers assume that, if a pupil is proficient in a language, they’ll be able to cope with the subject matter.
So, in science, those who speak and are taught in English are presumed to have an advantage.
If that was the case, all first-language English speakers who are taught in English would excel in science – but this is simply not true.
That’s because science classrooms have an entirely different language. A pupil who is fluent in English will know what “decay” means in an English lesson or a biology text. In physics, the word means something totally different.
Our findings over the past five years have been nearly identical to those in other transnational studies and in my earlier work.
Teaching students and pupils battle with the unique language of the science classroom irrespective of gender, cultural or linguistic backgrounds.
Proficiency in the language of the science classroom is key, though it’s certainly not the only factor that will stop people from performing well in the subject.
Our research suggests that if everyone is at the same level of proficiency in a single language when they start learning science, it removes a serious barrier to performance.
Many of South Africa’s children are still learning in a second or even third language.
The shortage of qualified African language teachers is a situation that seems unlikely to improve any time soon. While debates about multilingualism continue, we cannot sit idle. So why not level the playing field by using just one language for all learning beyond grade 3?
As to which language this should be, there is evidence to suggest that many South African parents want their children to be taught and become proficient in English. English is considered useful for future studies at tertiary institutions anywhere in the world and is also the most widely spoken of the 11 official languages globally.
Once a language has been chosen, the education department can focus on ensuring that pupils are proficient in it, in much the same way that schools foster computer literacy.
Pupils will then be able to learn and perform in science according to their individual capabilities to handle science concepts without language as an added handicap.
A similar policy has been pursued elsewhere in sub-Saharan Africa. In Lusophone countries, Portuguese is the language of instruction, Francophone countries often use French as the medium of instruction and Anglophone countries favour English in the classroom.
These languages hark back to colonial times, which may make people uncomfortable. But on a practical level they are similar to English – far more widely spoken globally than any local languages.
This is not to say that all other official languages as recognised in the Constitution are irrelevant or that multilingualism shouldn’t have any place in schools.
Multilingualism fosters social cohesion and languages are a crucial part of people’s individual cultures.
When it comes to learning school science, however, the single language policy is a sustainable one. One language for all school learning will focus pupils’ efforts on attaining good proficiency levels in it.
The single language policy therefore has the potential to enhance learning outcomes and to speedily produce the science skills that South Africa needs. – theconversation.com
Samuel Ouma Oyoo teaches science education at Wits University
Create Account | Lost Your Password?