Editorial: Zuma’s end would only be the start

Obviously, as a loyal ANC office-bearer, Deputy Justice Minister John Jeffery was going to stand up in Parliament and defend the president during an impeachment motion. It was less obvious, however, that SABC chief operations officer Hlaudi Motsoeneng would weigh in on constitutional matters, opining that it was a matter of interpretation – and that, in fact, the Constitutional Court did not say President Jacob Zuma did anything wrong.

Is Motsoeneng now acting as a political commentator? Has the SABC fired or blacklisted so many commentators for holding anti-Zuma views that Motsoeneng has to step into the breach? At any rate, his and Jeffery’s argument is pathetic. It is a sign that they have either not read the Constitutional Court judgment or not understood it. Or they are simply lying.

The judgment is quite clear that Zuma essentially broke his oath of office by acting in an unconstitutional manner.

And that is why a storm is raging, as we report this week, on the Zuma issue – a storm in government, in the ANC and across South Africa.

Civil society is finding its voice again, it would seem, and pulling together in the face of a single enemy.

The battle has narrowed down to the issue of “Zuma must go” and the two opposing sides have become more sharply demarcated. The Jefferys and Motsoenengs of the world are starting to look rather lonely; the other side is growing and growing.

The key point to be made, however, is one articulated by former Constitutional Court justice Zak Yacoob when he spoke at a remarkable gathering of struggle elders and social leaders who called on Zuma to resign for the sake of the ANC and South Africa in general.

Yacoob pointed out that Zuma must go, yes, but that he is, in the end, simply the most prominent and visible symbol of larger ills besetting the movement, the government and the country: abuse of power, corruption, and using the party and government to build personal empires – enriching yourself while ignoring what you were elected to do, which is to build a new South Africa and provide a better life for all, especially the poorest.

Zuma’s departure would undoubtedly be a good thing, but it would not be the end.

It would be only the first step in a process that should cleanse South Africa of political leaders who are really only in it for themselves, not to serve the people – and thereby also cleanse the ANC of leaders and members who have contravened constitutional provisions meant to curb corruption and abuse of power.

Without that, South Africa will struggle to remain a constitutional democracy or maintain the rule of law. It runs the risk of turning into a banana republic in which mini-Mobutus can assume everything to be part of their personal kingdom, to exploit and pillage as they like.

We make it make sense

If this story helped you navigate your world, subscribe to the M&G today for just R30 for the first three months

Subscribers get access to all our best journalism, subscriber-only newsletters, events and a weekly cryptic crossword.”

Related stories


Already a subscriber? Sign in here


Latest stories

Art imitates life at the National Arts Festival

This year’s National Arts Festival in Makhanda - the first live one since the pandemic - tackles unemployment, the Marikana Massacre and the manner in which black women in society are written about

Pride is a heavy price to pay

While constitutionally protected, the LGBTQIA+ community is being failed by the state

Africa’s Covid neglect poses global danger

Low vaccination levels and high number of health-compromised populations make the continent a ‘breeding ground for variants’ that pose a global risk

Kenya opposition leader selects woman as running mate

For the first time a woman is running on a major presidential ticket – a big marker in Kenya’s history. But for marginalised voters, the politics of representation comes with many contradictions

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…