​South Africa’s UN non-vote against discrimination is an ‘insult’ to LGBTI community

South Africa’s decision to abstain from voting on a United Nations resolution to prevent discrimination based on sexual orientation was shocking and an insult, a rights group said on Tuesday.

“This is really concerning and insulting to LGBTI people, because South Africa chose to build solidarity with African countries which are homophobic and discriminate against sexual minorities,” Access Chapter 2 director Mmapaseka “Steve” Letsike said. South Africa’s position at the UN was shocking and ignored its own Constitution, she said.

The South African government abstained from voting on the resolution at the UN Human Rights Council last Thursday. The resolution was passed with 23 votes for, 18 against, and six abstentions. No African country voted in favour of the resolution.

It establishes an independent expert on protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity for the next three years.

Letsike said South Africa has shown inconsistencies in its policies relating to the lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and/or intersex (LGBTI) community. Her organisation and several other partners, such as Pan Africa LGBTI, had lobbied for two weeks to change the government’s decision on its vote, but to no avail. They wrote to the international relations department, Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa and Deputy Justice Minister Thabang Makwetla.

The government explained its decision to abstain by saying: “The draft resolution added unnecessary divisiveness, building on the previous African initiative of 2012.”

Letsike said South Africa had a national task team to address hate crimes on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. South Africa could thus not be inconsistent in international forums.

She added that the only explanation for South Africa’s abstention was that it feared becoming marginalised on the continent, but this was no excuse for betraying the values and principles enshrined in the Constitution. “South Africa should have sent a clear message that we stand by the rights of our people,” she added. – News24

Keep the powerful accountable

Subscribe for R30/mth for the first three months. Cancel anytime.

Subscribers get access to all our best journalism, subscriber-only newsletters, events and a weekly cryptic crossword.

Related stories


Already a subscriber? Sign in here


Latest stories

Fraud case just one example of governance failings at Basketball...

The sport body’s former national administrator allegedly stole money by substituting his own bank account details for a service provider’s

Elderly land claimants wait in vain for restitution

While the government fails to adhere to its own deadlines, the clock is ticking for a group of Black people who were evicted from their land in the decade before apartheid ended

Protesters die demanding full civilian rule

Sudan’s army pre-empted a handover to civilians with a coup, and then reinstated the civilian leader. On the streets, risking life and limb, demonstrators are still demanding the exit of the military

Debunked: The cruel and racist logic of Omicron travel bans

Wealthy countries were quick to ban Southern African nations from entering their borders when the Omicron variant was identified, but did not do so to each other.

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…