Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

The rise of the independent council candidates who reject conventional authority

There is a growing mood around the world of rejecting conventional authority – Occupy Wall Street, Arab Spring, hashtag protests like #FeesMustFall. In South Africa, one manifestation of this trend is the rise of independent council candidates. Where I live in Makana, Eastern Cape, 5 out of 14 wards are being contested by independents, comparable to the number of wards one established party, Azapo, is contesting, and more than Cope (no candidates) or UDM (only one PR candidate).

In other parts of the country, the independent movement has taken another form – Forum 4 Service Delivery (F4SD) has put up 300 candidates mostly in Northwest, but with a substantial number in Gauteng and Limpopo and some in Mpumalanga. F4SD is an umbrella for independents, and has grown out of nothing in a matter of a few months.

Other similar campaigns have arisen other areas, such as the Sterkspruit Development Forum in the Eastern Cape and Palmridge Community Forum in Gauteng.

It will be interesting to see if independents have electoral success: this is a new phenomenon in our current political order, which has been dominated by political parties, most of which have strong top-down organisation and control. The ANC deploys down to municipal level: though a council formally elects a mayor, councillors do what they are told by head office. Indeed, there has been at least one case where ANC councillors got in trouble for electing a DA mayor. It remains to be seen how DA head office would react to DA councillors electing an ANC mayor – yet there is no reason not to do so in either case, if the other party has the best candidate.

The other new kid on the block, EFF, has yet to win office so it is hard to know how they will operate. The fact that they appear from the outside to operate a leadership cult with the not very democratic sounding title of “commander-in-chief” for the party leader suggests that they too will operate by direction from head office.

At municipal level, issues are local and personal and there is a strong case for councillors to focus on being accountable to their community, which is why we have ward elections and not a pure PR system as we have at national and provincial level. Yet parties operate a caucus system at local government, giving individual councillors little latitude to work directly for the interests of their community – particularly when doing so would conflict with their party’s agenda.

Will independents remedy the many flaws in delivery? I don’t know, but the experiment is worth trying because we are more than 20 years into democracy and the other way has failed in many communities – water outages, failure to replace bucket toilets, poorly maintained roads.

A factor in the failure of municipal services is that our new constitutional order was not accompanied by a citizen’s education programme to foster active citizenship and to build civil society. Councillors who are more accessible and who are more directly accountable to the community could help to foster active citizenship; it is in their interests to do so as direct community involvement will help them build their base.

We live in exciting times – fluid, unpredictable political movements around the world; who would have predicted the rise of Trump, the narrow loss of Bernie Sanders against a much more favoured Democrat, the rise of Jeremy Corbyn, the Brexit vote?

In this environment I am hesitant to make predictions. All I can say is that independents add an interesting new option to the mix; if this growing movement helps to build grassroots democracy, political accountability and a more active civil society: great. If not, it is at least worth a try, because our previous methods have failed.

The author has provided advice to F4SD but is not an office bearer of, nor a candidate for any political movement.

Subscribe for R500/year

Thanks for enjoying the Mail & Guardian, we’re proud of our 36 year history, throughout which we have delivered to readers the most important, unbiased stories in South Africa. Good journalism costs, though, and right from our very first edition we’ve relied on reader subscriptions to protect our independence.

Digital subscribers get access to all of our award-winning journalism, including premium features, as well as exclusive events, newsletters, webinars and the cryptic crossword. Click here to find out how to join them and get a 57% discount in your first year.

Philip Machanick
Philip Machanick is an associate professor of computer science at Rhodes University

Related stories

WELCOME TO YOUR M&G

If you’re reading this, you clearly have great taste

If you haven’t already, you can subscribe to the Mail & Guardian for less than the cost of a cup of coffee a week, and get more great reads.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

Advertising

Subscribers only

South Africa breaking more temperature records than expected

The country’s climate is becoming ‘more extreme’ as temperature records are broken

Environmental groups welcome China’s pledge on coal

Will China’s end of coal finance be the final nail in the coffin for MMESZ?

More top stories

South Africa breaking more temperature records than expected

The country’s climate is becoming ‘more extreme’ as temperature records are broken

Environmentalists are trying to save South Africa’s obscure endangered species

Scientists are digging for De Winton’s golden moles, working on the mystery of the riverine rabbit and using mesh mattresses to save the unique Knysna seahorse

Shadow states infest Africa’s democracies

Two recent reports show evidence that democracy in Africa is being threatened by private power networks

The West owes Africa $100bn (at least) for climate recovery

In fewer than three days, a US citizen emits as much carbon as a person from Chad or Niger does in one year. Such is the asymmetry in culpability for climate change.
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…
×